期刊文献+

不同阅读材料对焦虑的缓解作用 被引量:2

Effects of different reading materials on easing anxiety
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同阅读材料对于焦虑的缓解作用。方法:以自愿方式招募175名普通学生(17~24岁),首先用高难度任务唤起被试的焦虑状态,然后随机将被试分为实验组和对照组,分别阅读领悟类和信息类的文字材料。通过情绪Stroop范式测量两组被试的焦虑水平。采用2×2实验设计,其中阅读材料为被试间因素,包括领悟类和信息类;词汇类型为被试内因素,包括积极词汇和消极词汇。结果:领悟组被试对积极词的反应时短于对消极词的反应时(P<0.05),而信息组被试对两类情绪词的反应时差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论:研究提示,领悟类材料比信息类材料更有助于缓解焦虑情绪。 Objective: To investigate the effects of reading different materials on easing the test anxiety. Methods: Totally 175 students aged 17 -24 were selected as subjects. After their test anxiety emotions being aroused by highly difficult task, they were randomly divided into realization group and information group to read text types of realization and information, respectively. Then, the two groups were surveyed by the Emotional Stroop task to test the anxiety level. A 2 × 2 experimental design was used, with text types as between-subject factor ( including realization and information texts) and words in stroop task as within-subject factor (including positive and negative words). Results: The students in the realization group reacted faster to positive words than to negative words [ (511.5 ±127.0) ms vs. (523. 2 ± 140. 8) ms, P 〈 0. 05], while there were no statistic significances in the information group (P 〉0. 05). The students in the realization group felt less anxiety than the information group (P 〈0. 05) Conclusion: It suggested that realization materials have more easing effects on students'test anxiety than information materials.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期157-160,共4页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金(30970910)
关键词 阅读材料 测验焦虑 情绪Stroop范式 reading material test anxiety emotional Stroop paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献89

共引文献214

同被引文献35

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部