摘要
临床研究的成功与否,与是否有效控制偏倚有关。在非随机化的观察性研究中,倾向性评分能减少对比组间的差异,缩小偏倚。与试验设计阶段进行配比控制偏倚相比,倾向性分析法不受试验设计(随机对照试验设计)方法的限制,无须在试验设计阶段进行随机,其结果更接近"真实世界"的实际干预效果而非临床试验的效果。因此,倾向性分析应用于中医个性化治疗的复杂干预疗效评价是适合的,具有重要的研究前景和使用价值。
The success of clinical research,depends on the ability to control the bias.In the non-randomized observational study,propensity score can reduce the contrast differences between groups and narrow bias.Compared with design stage through matching control bias,propehsity analysis frees from experimental design(randomized controlled trial design) approach limits,with no need for rahdomization in the design stage.The result is closer to "real world" aitual effectiveness rather than the clinical trial results.Therefore,propehsity analysis applying to personalized medicine treatment efficacy evaluation of complex interventions is appropriate,has an important prospects and use value.
出处
《中国中医基础医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第2期218-220,共3页
JOURNAL OF BASIC CHINESE MEDICINE
基金
国家高新技术研究发展计划(863计划)"缺血性中风早期康复和避免复发中医方案研究"(2007AA02Z4B2)
中国中医科学院自主选题研究项目"基于倾向性分析的缺血性中风早期康复中医复杂干预疗效评价研究"(Z02108)
关键词
倾向性分析
混杂因素
中医复杂干预
疗效评价
propensity score analysis
Confounding factors
TCM complex intervention
clinical efficacy evaluation