期刊文献+

丙泊酚注射痛指导无痛人流术后镇痛模式的临床观察 被引量:1

Clinical Observation of Postoperative Analgesia Mode Guided by Injection Pain of Propofol in Painless Abortion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨用丙泊酚注射痛指导无痛人流术后镇痛模式的可行性.[方法]选择本院2011年1~6月拟行无痛人流的患者1200例,年龄18~42岁,ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级,按照手术先后顺序分为分为三组(Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ组),每组400例.三组均以0.5 mL/s的速率静注1%丙泊酚2 mg/kg,当丙泊酚给药量达1/4时暂停给药,采用语言等级评定量表(VRS)评分法评价丙泊酚注射痛(VRS 1分为发生注射痛,VRS≥2分为中重度注射痛),之后静注剩余量丙泊酚完成麻醉诱导,Ⅰ组所有病例未予其他特殊处理;Ⅱ、Ⅲ组中VRS≥1分者术中静注舒芬太尼0.2 μg/kg;Ⅲ组中VRS≥2分者术后另给予下腹部理疗辅助镇痛.术后30 min时采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评价患者无痛人流术后疼痛程度,VAS评分≥30分为发生术后疼痛.[结果]丙泊酚注射痛发生率Ⅰ组为67%,Ⅱ组为68.5%,Ⅲ组为65%,三组间差异无统计学意义( P >0.05);术后疼痛发生率Ⅰ组为70%,Ⅱ组为26%,Ⅲ组为11.3%,Ⅱ、Ⅲ组与Ⅰ组比较差异有显著性( P <0.01),说明依据丙泊酚注射痛给予舒芬太尼能明显减少术后疼痛发生率;Ⅱ组与Ⅲ组比较差异有显著性( P <0.01),说明依据丙泊酚注射痛程度给予不同术后镇痛模式的有效性.[结论]应用丙泊酚注射痛指导无痛人流术后镇痛的模式是一种可靠的方法. [Objective] To explore the feasibility of postoperative analgesia mode guided by injection-induced pain of propofol in painless abortion. [Methods] Totally 1200 patients(aged 18~38 years old) with ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ elective painless a- bortion were chronologically divided into 3 groups(group Ⅰ,Ⅱ andⅢ) with 400 cases in each group. Anesthesia of every group was induced with 2mg/kg 1% propofo[. Propofo[ was withdrawal when the dosage was up to the fourth of total in- duction dose. Verbal rating scale(VRS) was used to assess the pain induced by propofol injection. If VRS was 1 score, injection pain occurred. If VRS was more than 2 scores, middle and severe injection pain occurred. Then the rest part of propofol was injected intravenously for anesthesia induction. All patients in group I were not given other special treat- ment. Those patients(VRS≥1) in group II and Ill were injected with 0.2μg/kg sufentanil during the operation. Those patients(VRS≥2) in group Ⅲ were additionally given abdominal physical therapy for assistant analgesia. Verbal analogue scale(VAS ) was used to evaluate the pain degree after painless abortion. If VAS was more than 30 scores, postoperative pain occurred. [Results] The incidence of the pain induced by propofol injection in group Ⅰ, group Ⅱ and groupⅢ was 67 %, 68. 5 % and 65 % respectively, and there was no significant difference among 3 groups( P 〉0.05). The incidence of postoperative pain in group Ⅰ, group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ was 70 %, 26% and 11.3% respectively, and there were signifi- cantly differences between groupⅡ, group Ⅲ and group Ⅰ( P 〈0.01). This suggested that sufentanil given according to the degree of injection pain obviously redufed the incidence of postoperative pain, and there was significant difference between group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ ( P 〈0.01 ). Different postoperative analgesia mode guided by the degree of injection pain was feasible. [Conclusion] Postoperative analgesia mode guided by the pain of propcffol injection in painless abortion is a reliable method.
出处 《医学临床研究》 CAS 2012年第1期64-66,共3页 Journal of Clinical Research
关键词 流产 人工 酚类/投药和剂量 镇痛 产科 Abortion,induced phenols/AD analgesia,obstetrical
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1耿桂启,许民辉,解轶,李宁,李唯一,黄绍强.异丙酚注射痛预测人工流产术后疼痛程度的准确性[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2010,30(1):33-35. 被引量:11
  • 2Kwak KH,Ha J,Kim Y,et al.Efficacy of combination intravenous lidecaine and dexamethasone on propofol injection pain:a randomized,double-blind,prospective study in adult Korean surgical patients[J].Clin Ther,2008,30(6):1113-1119.
  • 3Aouad MT,Siddik-Sayyid SM,Al-Alami AA,et al.Multimodal analgesia to prevent propofol-induced pain:pretreatment with remifentanil and lidocaine versus remifentanil or lidocaine alone[J].Anesth Analg,2007,104(6):1540-1544.
  • 4彭小春,果淑兰,冯爱玲,阎小晖,赵洪武.不同部位静脉注射丙泊酚局部疼痛的观察[J].护理研究(下半月),2005,19(2):354-355. 被引量:10

二级参考文献17

  • 1孙立智,韩雷,赵国胜,梁海燕,魏造泉,席南,于玲,冯爱玲.异丙酚在无痛人工流产术时联合用药的临床观察[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2003,4(5):331-333. 被引量:18
  • 2Dolin SJ, Cashman JN, Bland JM. Effectiveness of acute postoperative pain management: I . Evidence from published data. Br J Anaesth, 2002, 89(3): 409-423.
  • 3Rudin A, Wolner-Hanssen P, Hellbom M, et al. Prediction of postoperative pain after a laparoscopic tubal ligation procedure, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2008, 52(7): 938-845.
  • 4Jamison RN, Taft K, O'Hara JP, et al. Psychosocial and pharmacologic predictors of satisfaction with intravenous patient-controUed analgesia. Anesth Analg, 1993, 77(1) : 121-125.
  • 5Hansson P, Ekblom A, Thomsson M, et al. Pain development and consumption of analgesics after oral surgery in relation to personality characteristics. Pain, 1989, 37(3):271-277.
  • 6Granot M, Lowenstein L, Yarnitsky D,et al. Postcesarean section pain prediction by preoperative experimental pain assessment. Anesthesiology, 2003, 98(6) : 1422-1426.
  • 7Pan PH, Coghill R, Houle TT, et al. Multifactofial preoperative predictors for postcesarean section pain and analgesic requirement. Anesthesiology, 2006, 104(3): 417-425.
  • 8Hsu YW, Somma J, Hung YC, et al. Predicting postoperative pain by preoperative pressure pain assessment. Anesthesiology, 2005, 103 (3) :613-618.
  • 9Nielsen PR, Nφrgaard L, Rasmussen KS, et al. Prediction of postoperative pain by an electrical pain stimulus. Acta Anaesthesiol Stand, 2007, 51(5): 582-586.
  • 10Nishiyama T. How to decrease pain at rapid injection of propofol: effectiveness of flurbiprofen. J Anesth, 2005, 19 (4) :273-276.

共引文献18

同被引文献8

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部