期刊文献+

当代西方对公共领域隐私问题的研究及其启示 被引量:13

On the Issue of Privacy in Public Domain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 西方传统的隐私研究,一般将隐私问题锁定在与公共领域相分离的私人领域。但随着现代社会的发展,特别是信息社会的到来,公共领域的隐私问题日益引起人们的担忧。西方学界正视这一新的隐私问题,力图使隐私理论能够适应当代社会的客观需要,从而突破传统的公共与私人二分法的限制,扩展了隐私研究的对象。虽然西方学者对公共领域隐私问题的研究具有重要的理论意义和实践意义,但这种研究又存在着某些不可否认的不足和缺陷。我们既要立足于中国特殊的国情,充分发挥自身文化资源的优势,又要批判地吸取西方学界的积极成果,建立自己的隐私理论,以为公共领域的隐私权立法提供相应的辩护。 In Western academic circles, the issue of privacy is traditionally confined to private domain which is separated from public domain. However, along with the development of modern society and the advent of information society, the issue of privacy in public domain has been causing increasingly serious concern. Facing up to this new issue of privacy, Western academ- ic scholars have been striving to make privacy theory fit in with the objective requirements of contemporary society. As a result, some Western scholars have broken through the limitations of traditional public - private dichotomy and extended the subjects of privacy study. Although Western studies on privacy in public domain are of both theoretical and practical value, yet undeniably there are defects and deficiencies in them. On the one hand, we should base ourselves on our special national culture and give full play to our own cultural resources; on the other hand, we must critically absorb the positive results of Western scholars, so that we may establish our own privacy theory with which the legislation for privacy in public domain will be defended.
作者 吕耀怀
出处 《上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期5-17,共13页 Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
基金 国家社科基金项目"社会公共生活中的隐私伦理研究"(10BZX062)
关键词 隐私 私人领域 公共领域 权利 privacy, private domain, public domain, fight
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Samuel Warren,Louis Brandeis.The Right to Privacy[J].Harvard Law Review,1890,(4).
  • 2James Fitzjames Stephen.Liberty,Equality and Fraternity[M].New York:Henry Hold and Co.,1873.
  • 3David Ferdinand Schoeman(ed).Philosophical Dimensions ofPrivacy:An Anthology[M].New York:Cambridge UniversityPress,1986.
  • 4A.F.Westin.Privacy and Freedom[J].New York:Athene-um,1967.
  • 5Ruth Gavison.Privacy and Limits of Law[J].The Yale LawJournal,Volume 89,Number3,1980.
  • 6A.L.Allen.Uneasy Access:Privacy for Women in a Free Soci-ety[M].Totowa:Rowman&Littlefield publishers,1988.
  • 7J.Inness.Privacy,Intimacy and Isolation[M].New york:Oxford University Press,1992.
  • 8C.Fried.Privacy[J].Yale Law Journal,1968,(77).
  • 9I.M.Young.Justice and the Politics of Difference[M].NewJersey:Princeton University Press,1990.
  • 10Beate.Rssler.The Value of Privacy[M].Cambridge:PolityPress,2005.

二级参考文献14

  • 1NEGLEY. Philosophical Views on the Value of Privacy [ J]. Law and Contemporary Problems, 1966, (31).
  • 2WARREN, BRANDEIS. The Right to Privacy[ J ]. Harvard Law Review, 1890, (4) :193 -220.
  • 3POST. Rereading Warren and Brandeis: Privacy, Pr - operty, and Appropriation [ J ]. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1991, (41) :647 -680.
  • 4REIMAN. Privacy, Intimacy, and Personhood [ J ]. Ph - ilosophy & Public Affairs, 1976, ( 1 ).
  • 5BENN. Privacy, Freedom, and Respect for Persons [ C ]//Ferdinand David Schoeman. Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy : An Anthology . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
  • 6ROSSLER. The Value of Privacy [ M ]. Cambridge : Polity Press, 2005.
  • 7GAVISON. Privacy and the Limits of Law [ J ]. Yale Law Journal, 1980, (89).
  • 8FRIED. Privacy , A moral analysis [ J ]. Yale Law Journal, 1968, (77):475-493.
  • 9GERSTEIN. Intimacy and Privacy[ J]. Ethics, 1978, (89).
  • 10BLOUSTEIN. Individual & Group Privacy [ M ]. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2003.

共引文献6

同被引文献81

引证文献13

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部