期刊文献+

产程中胎心基线短变异与围产儿预后不良的相关性探讨 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨胎儿电子监护中胎心基线短变异参数的临床界值及意义,评价短变异(STV)与围产儿预后不良的相关性。方法:回顾性分析2009年1~6月对1 216例产妇进行全产程胎心监护,分析监护图形STV值,并对其中296例测脐动脉血pH值,结合分娩时羊水性状、新生儿1 min Apgar评分和围产儿病率分析其相关性。结果:以STV<3.0 ms为界值,预测胎儿酸中毒的灵敏度为59.80%,特异度94.84%,阳性预测值85.92%,阴性预测值81.78%;预测新生儿窒息的灵敏度为52.20%,特异度98.94%,阳性预测值89.62%,阴性预测值92.16%。结论:STV<3.0 ms可以作为临床预测胎儿酸中毒和新生儿窒息的可靠指标,与新生儿1 min Apgar评分、脐动脉血pH值和围产儿预后不良有显著相关性。
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第7期1031-1032,共2页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1张珂,贺晶,余平,吴明远,僬铃洁.胎心监护中短变异与分娩结局的关系[J].实用妇产科杂志,2006,22(4):244-246. 被引量:7
  • 2Fort A, Marotil L, Rocchi S, et al. Parametric spectral analysis of Umbilical artery Doppler signals for fetal heart rate variability evalution [J] . EurJ Ultrasound, 1995, 2 (2) : 321 ~328.
  • 3Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redmann CWG. Shortterm fetal heart rate variation, decelerations and umbilical flow velocity [ J] . Obstet Gynecol, 1992, 80 (4): 673 ~675.
  • 4Dawes GS, Redman CW. Sonicaid System 8002 : Objective CTG analysis system user guide [J]. Oxford Instruments Medical System Division, Oxford, 1995, 19 (1): 47-51.
  • 5Galazios G, Tripsianis G, Tsikouras P, et al. Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2009, 279 (5) : 623 ~625.
  • 6Thacker SB, Stroup DF, Peterson HB. Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update [J] . Obstet Gynecol, 1995, 86(4) : 613-620.
  • 7Garcia GS, Araujo Junior E, Garcia RL, et al. Fetal acidemia prediction through short - term variation assessed by antepartum computerized cardiotocography in pregnant women with hypertension syndrome [J] . Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2008, 278:125-128.
  • 8戴红,高眉扬.胎心基线短变异参数对胎儿窘迫的预测价值[J].广州医学院学报,2005,33(2):49-52. 被引量:2

二级参考文献12

  • 1石一复.声刺激试验及其在胎儿监测中的应用[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,1996,12(2):109-110. 被引量:12
  • 2Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redmann CWG. Short-term fetal heart rate variation,decelerations and Umbilical Flow Velocity. Obstet Gynecol, 1992,80(4) : 673-675.
  • 3Devender R, Bidyut K, Douglas G T, et al. Computerised antenatal felal heart rate recording hetween 24 and 28 weeks of gestation. British J Obstet Gynecol, 2001,108(8 ) : 858 - 863.
  • 4Paper JT, King T. Fetal heart rate monitoring: is it salvageable [J] ? Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2000,182 (4) :982- 987.
  • 5Vintzileos AM, Egan JF, Campbell WA, et al. Asphyxia at birth as determined by cord blood PH measurements in preterm and term gestations: correlation with neonatal outcome[J]. J Matern Fet Med, 1992,1 ( 1 ) :7 - 13.
  • 6Dawes GS, Mulden M, Redmam CWG. System 8000:computeried anternatal fetal heart rate analysis [J]. J Perinat Med,1991,19( 1 ) :47 -51.
  • 7Street P, Marcs GS, Dawes DM, et al. Short-term variation in abnormal antenatal fetal heart rate records [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1991,165 ( 3 ) :515 - 523.
  • 8Fort A, Marotil L, Rocchi S, et al. Parametic speetral analysis of Umbilical astery Doppler Signals for fetal heart rate variability evlution [J]. Eur J ultrasound, 1995,2 (2):321 - 328.
  • 9Gull I, Jaffa AJ, Oren M, et al. Acid accumulation during end-stage bradycardia in term fetuses: how long is too long [J] ? Br J Obstet Gynecol, 1996,103 ( 11 ):1096 - 1101.
  • 10Thacker SB, Stroup DF, Peterson HB. Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update [J].Obstet Gynecol, 1995,86 (4) :613 - 620.

共引文献7

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部