期刊文献+

Prolift盆底重建术35例临床分析 被引量:2

Clinical analysis of 35 patients with pelvic organ prolapse using Prolift
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Prolift盆底重建术对盆腔器官脱垂的治疗效果。方法回顾性分析2010-02~2010-08我院使用Prolift盆腔修复系统治疗不同程度、不同类型的盆腔器官脱垂患者35例的临床疗效、围手术期并发症。结果应用全盆修复系统33例,前盆修复系统2例;应用全盆修复系统的病例中有2例同时行经闭孔尿道中段无张力悬吊术(TVT-O术式),5例患者行全子宫切除术后应用盆底修复系统。通过手术前后POP-Q评分系统分析疗效,痊愈30例,好转4例,复发1例。术中发生膀胱损伤者3例。结论 Prolift全盆修复系统器械设计较合理、易于被临床医师较好掌握、微创、复发率低,是治疗盆腔器官脱垂的较好选择。 Objective To explore the outcome of Prolift system for pelvic organ prolapse.Methods The clinical data of 35 cases of pelvic organ prolapse who underwent pelvic floor reconstruction using Prolift system in our hospital from February 2010 to August 2010 were analyzed retrospectively.Results Of 35 patients,33 patients underwent total Prolift and 2 patients underwent anterior Prolift.Of 33 patients with total Prolift,2 patients underwent simultaneously transvaginal tape-obturator,and 5 patients underwent hysterectomy before Prolift.According to pelvic organ prolapse quantification(POP-Q) stage,30 patients recovered,4 patients got better and one recurred.The bladder perforation during operation happened in 3 patients.Conclusion Prolift may be a good selection for pelvic organ prolapse with proper design,accessible to manage for clinical doctors,less invasion and lower recurrence.
出处 《山西医科大学学报》 CAS 2012年第2期129-131,共3页 Journal of Shanxi Medical University
关键词 盆腔器官脱垂 Prolift修复系统 疗效 pelvic organ prolapse Prolift outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

  • 1Handel LN, Frenkl TL, Kim YH. Results of cystocele repair: a comparison of traditional anterior colporrhaphy, polypropylene mesh and porcine dermis [J]. J Urol, 2007,178( 1 ) : 153 - 156.
  • 2Mistrangelo E, Mancuso S, Nadalini C, et al. Rising use of synthetic mesh in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery: a review of the risk of vaginal erosion [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2007,14(5) :564- 569.
  • 3DeSouza R, Shapiro A, Westney OL. Adductor brevis myositis following transobturator tape procedure: a case report and review of the literature [ J]. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysftmct,2007,18 (7) : 817 - 820.
  • 4Marian A, Svabtk K, Masata J. The incidence and prevalence of complications after urogynaecological and reconstructive pelvic floor prosthetic surgery and management of these complications in women [J]. Ceska Gynekol,2007, 72(6):410- 415.
  • 5Boulanger L, Bookerrou M, Rubod C, et al. Bacteriological analysis of meshes removed for complications after surgical management of urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse [J]. lnt Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2008,19(6) : 827 - 831.
  • 6Chen HY, Ho M, Hung YC, et al. Analysis of risk factors associated with vaginal erosion after synthetic sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence [ J ]. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2008, 19 ( 1 ) : 117 - 121.
  • 7Sivaslioglu AA, Unlubilgin E, Dolen I. The multifilament polypropylene tape erosion trouble: tape structure vs surgical technique. Which one is the cause [J]. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct,2008, 19(3):417 - 420.
  • 8Kobashi KC, Dmochowski R, Mee SL, et al. Erosion of woven polyester pubovaginal sling [J] .J Urol, 1999,162(6) :2070 - 2072.
  • 9Wu MP.The use of prostheses in pelvic reconstructive surgery: joy or toy [ J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol,2008,47(2) : 151 - 156.
  • 10[1]Olsen AL,Smith VJ,Bergstrom JO,et al.Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.Obstet Gynecol 1997,89:501-506.

共引文献104

同被引文献9

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部