期刊文献+

Fraud Prevention Mechanisms of Malaysian Government-Linked Companies: An Assessment of Existence and Effectiveness 被引量:2

Fraud Prevention Mechanisms of Malaysian Government-Linked Companies: An Assessment of Existence and Effectiveness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Understanding the root causes of fraud and learning about the most effective fraud prevention mechanisms are critical in reducing the incidence of financial fraud. Therefore, this study solicits the views of fraud investigators on the existence and effectiveness of fraud prevention mechanisms within Government-Linked Companies (GLCs). Specifically, effective fraud prevention mechanisms (FPM) should be undertaken by five critical groups, namely the board of directors, audit committees, external auditors, internal auditors, and anti-fraud specialists. A total of 147 questionnaires were distributed to fraud investigators of all public listed GLCs in Malaysia. Out of those, a total of 45 usable responses were received, which represents an effective response rate of 30.6%. In terms of existence, the respondents ranked "management review of internal controls" and "external audits of financial statements" as the top-most FPMs. This was followed by other mechanisms such as operational audits, internal audits and internal control review/improvements by departments. Out of the 27 fraud prevention mechanisms, fraud investigators perceiyed surprise audits, fraud hotline, fraud prevention program and training, anti-fraud policy, fraud vulnerability reviews, operational audits, whistle-blowing policy, internal audit or fraud examination department, and, imposing penalty and disciplinary action as more effective than the others. Overall, this study provides important insights to practitioners and organizations in identifying fraud prevention mechanisms that are most effective.
出处 《Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing》 2012年第1期15-31,共17页 现代会计与审计(英文版)
关键词 fraud prevention mechanism (FPM) financial fraud government-linked companies (GLCs) 欺诈行为 马来西亚 机制 政府 防范 内部审计 评估 内部控制
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1American Institute of Certified Public Accountants [AICPA], Association of Certified Fraud Examiners [ACFE], Financial Executives International [FEI], Information Systems Audit and Control Association [ISACAj, Institute of Internal Auditors [IIA], Institute of Management Accountants [IMA], & Society for Human Resource Management [SHRM]. (2002). Management antifraud programs and controls: Guidance to help prevent and deter fraud.
  • 2Asian Development Bank. (2004). Asian development outlook 2004 update. Manila.
  • 3Association of Certified Fraud Examiners [ACFE] & American Institute of Certified Public Accountants [AICP A]. (2002). Fraud prevention check up: How fraud hurts you and your organization. The Association of Certified Examiners.
  • 4Association of Certified Fraud Examiners [ACFE]. (2008). The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners' 2008 Report to the nation on occupational fraud and abuse.
  • 5Bierstaker, J. L., Brody, R. D., & Pacini, C. (2006). Accountants' perceptions regarding fraud detection and prevention methods. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(5), 520-535.
  • 6Bishop, T. J. F. (2004). Preventing, deterring, and detecting fraud: What works and what doesn't. Journal of Investment Compliance, 5(2), 120-127.
  • 7Carpenter, B. W., & Mahoney, D. P. (2001, April). Analyzing organizational fraud. Internal Auditor, 33-38.
  • 8Coenen, T. (2008). The wide-reaching impact of financial statement fraud. Retrieved September 17, 2008 from http://www.sequenceinc.com/index. php?option=com _ content&view=article& id=41 :the-wide-reaching-impact -of- financial-st atement-fraud.
  • 9Green Book. (2006). The Green Book: Enhancing board effectiveness. Putrajaya Committee GLC High Performance. Hair, J. F. J., Money, A H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2007). Research methods for business. John Wiley and Sons, Inc .. Hemraj, M. B. (2004). Preventing corporate scandals. Journal of Financial Crime, 11(3),268-276.
  • 10Hillison, W., Pacini, C., & Sinason, D. (1999). The internal auditor as fraud-buster. Managerial Auditing Journal, 14(7), 351-362.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部