美国反托拉斯法生成进路研究——以规制铁路公司垄断为线索被引量：11

A Study on the Emergence of Antitrust Law in the US

导出

摘要 19世纪下半叶是美国反托拉斯法生成的重要时期。这一时期铁路公司垄断成为社会普遍关注的焦点。面对此,联邦和州采取了不同的措施,其中州承担了反铁路公司垄断的主要任务,初步形成了州反托拉斯法的制度框架,为联邦反托拉斯法的生成奠定了基础。在这一历史进程中,对公用事业垄断的规制、州反托拉斯法的建设以及《谢尔曼法》背后利益的关注,构成了解读反托拉斯法生成进路的三个结点。 The second half of the 19th century is a critical period for the emergence of antitrust law for the US. During this period, the monopoly of railway corporations was the focus of the public. Faced with this, various measures were taken in state and federal level. The states undertook a major part against the monopoly of railway corporations in forming a primary institutional framework in antitrust law and laid the foundation for federal antitrust law. In this historical process, the regulation on public utilities, the construction of state anti- trust law, and the interest concerns behind Sherman Act were three key points.

作者陈兵

机构地区吉林大学法学院

出处《法制与社会发展》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期28-38,共11页 Law and Social Development

基金吉林大学科学前沿与交叉学科创新项目"美国反托拉斯法形成期历史研究--以19世纪下半叶州法为中心"(2010JC025) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目"反垄断法实施的跨国化与国际化问题研究--全球化时代从对抗走向合作的历史解读与启示"(10YJC820003) 吉林省社会科学基金一般项目"反垄断法实施下吉林省农业产业政策与竞争政策协调问题研究--以农业豁免制度为中心"(2011B016)

关键词铁路公司联邦最高法院州法反托拉斯法公用事业 railway corporations Federal Supreme Court state law antitrust law public utility

分类号 D971.2 [政治法律—法学] DD912.29 [政治法律]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献31

1[美]杰里米·阿塔克,彼得·帕塞尔.新美国经济史--从殖民地时期到1940年:上[M].罗涛等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000.
2Jeremy Atack. Firm Size and Industrial Structure in the United States During the Nineteenth Century [ J ]. The Journal of Economic History, 1986, (2).
3Jeremy Atack. Economies of Scale and Efficiency Gains in the Rise of the Factory in America, 1820- 1900 [A]. Peter Kilby. Quantity and Quiddity: Essays in U. S. Economic History [ C ]. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1987.
4Lawrence M. Friedman. A History of American Law [ M]. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc. , 1985.
5铁满素.美国文明[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2001.
6Stone & Others v. Illinois Central Railroad Company [Z]. 116 U. S. 347; 6 S. Ct. 348; 29 L. Ed. 650; 1886.U. S.
7Railroad Commission Cases. Stone & Others v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Company [Z]. 116 U. S. 307; 6 S. Ct. 334; 29 L. Ed. 636; 1886 U. S.
8Union Pacific Railway Company v. United States [ Z] ; United States v. Union Pacific Railway Company [ Z ]. 117 U. S. 355; 6 S. Ct. 772; 29 L. Ed. 920; 1886 U. S.
9Wabash, St. Louis and Pacific Railway Company v. Illinois [Z]. 118 U. S. 557; 7 S. Ct. 4; 30 L. Ed. 244; 1886 U. S.
10Arthur T. Hadley. Private Monopolies and Public Rights [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1886, (1).