不同护理模式在经尿道前列腺汽化电切术后患者并发排尿困难中应用的效果评价

Comparison on the nursing effect of different nursing modes in patients with dysuria after transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate

目的探讨比较不同护理模式在经尿道前列腺汽化电切术后患者并发排尿困难中的护理效果。方法选取2007月1月至2011年3月的50例经尿道前列腺汽化电切术后并发排尿困难患者为研究对象，将其随机分为A组与B组每组各25例，A组采用传统常规护理方法进行护理，B组采用循证护理模式进行护理，将2组患者的自行排尿率、尿管使用率、留置尿管时间、最大尿流率、再次排尿困难发生率、满意度、治疗依从性及护理前后的生存质量进行统计及比较。结果B组自行排尿率、满意度均高于A组，尿管使用率、再次排尿困难发生率低于A组，留置尿管时间短于A组，治疗依从性及生存质量评分优于A组，差异均有统计学意义。结论循证护理在经尿道前列腺汽化电切术后患者并发排尿困难中的护理效果较好，可改善患者的生存质量，较受患者欢迎。

Objective To study and compare the nursing effect of different nursing modes in patients with dysuria after transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate. Methods 50 patients with dysuria after transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate from January 2007 to March 2011 were selected as research objects,and they were randomly divided into group A and group B with 25 cases in each group, group A was taken care with routine nursing method,group B adopted evidence-based nursing mode,then the rate of seff-maturate,usage rate of catheter, time of indwelling catheter,maximum flow rate,relapse of dysuria,satisfaction degree,treatment compliance and quality of life before and after the nursing of two groups were analyzed and compared. Results The rate of seff-maturate and satisfaction degree of group B were higher than those of group A,usage rate of catheter and relapse of dysuria were lower than those of group A,time of indwelling catheter was shorter than that of group A,treatment compliance and quality of life were all better than those of group A,there were significant differences. Conclusions The nursing effect of evidence-based nursing mode in patients with dysuria after transurcthral electrovaporization of the prostate is good, it can significantly improve the quality of life and is popular among patients.