摘要
Background Intravascular volume expansion represents a beneficial measure against contrast-induced acute kidney injury （CI-AKI） in patients undergoing elective angiographic procedures. However, the efficacy of this preventive strategy has not yet been established for patients with ST-elevation-myocardial infarction （STEMI）, who are at higher risk of this complication after primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）. In this randomized study we investigated the possible beneficial role of periprocedural intravenous volume expansion and we compared the efficacy of 2 different hydration strategies in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.
Background Intravascular volume expansion represents a beneficial measure against contrast-induced acute kidney injury （CI-AKI） in patients undergoing elective angiographic procedures. However, the efficacy of this preventive strategy has not yet been established for patients with ST-elevation-myocardial infarction （STEMI）, who are at higher risk of this complication after primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）. In this randomized study we investigated the possible beneficial role of periprocedural intravenous volume expansion and we compared the efficacy of 2 different hydration strategies in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.
