期刊文献+

言语行为转喻源始域选择与会话者权势关系——《雷雨》的认知文体分析 被引量:1

The Relevance of Choice of Source Domain to Power Relationship——A Cognitive Reading of Thunderstorm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 与隐喻研究现状相似,国内外大部分转喻研究目前都集中在名词构成的指称性转喻上,由动词表征的谓词性转喻和言外转喻少有人问津。使用言语行为转喻学说,笔者考察了《雷雨》著名片断"喝药"的一段会话,发现人物在选择喻体即事态场景内的成分部分时与人物权势关系有关,强势者往往选择行为场景中转喻力度强的行为成分:事态核心成分和离核心成分最近的成分;而弱势者则倾向于采用转喻力度较弱的成分:非事态核心成分和距其较远的成分。言语行为转喻,若辅之以某些语用概念,不但为交际中频现的间接言语行为提供了新的解释方法,而且对于解读戏剧人物具有指导性意义。 Similar to current studies on metaphor, most cognitive linguistic scholars focus their attention on referential (nominal) metony- my, ignoring predicative and illocutionary ones. Within the framework of speech act metonymy, the author analyzes a dialogue of Thunderstorm, finding out that there is relevance of choice of source domain to the power relationships of characters. Powerful ones tend to select Core elements, while the less powerful do the Before components to activate whole speech act scenario. The notion of speech act metonymy, together with some pragmatic parameters, is crucial to exploring indirect speech acts in daily communication, and drama style as well.
作者 陈柯妮
出处 《北京第二外国语学院学报》 2011年第12期17-23,共7页 Journal of Beijing International Studies University
基金 广东省社科"十一五"规划项目<认知隐喻 转喻维度的曹禺戏剧研究>(09K-05)阶段性成果
关键词 言语行为转喻 事态场景 源始域选择 权势关系 《雷雨》 文体分析 speech act metonymy state-of-affaires scenario choice of source domain power relationship Thunderstorm stylisticanalysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献41

  • 1王文斌.论隐喻构建的主体自洽[J].外语教学,2007,28(1):5-10. 被引量:20
  • 2覃胜勇.从语言的隐喻性看动词述谓结构[J].南华大学学报(社会科学版),2007,8(3):102-104. 被引量:1
  • 3Cameron, L. Operationalising ' metaphor' for applied linguistic research[A]. In Cameron, L. and L. Graham. (eds.). Researching and Applying Metaphor [ C ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1999 : 3-28.
  • 4Cameron, L. Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse data[A]. In Cameron, L. and L. Graham. (eds.). Researching and Applying Metaphor[ C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999:105-134.
  • 5Chen , E. et al. Functional-anatomical organization of predicate metaphor processing [ J ]. Brain & Language, 2008 ( 107 ) : 194-202.
  • 6Croft, W. and D. A. Cruse. Cognitive Linguistics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  • 7Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live by[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 8Langacker, R. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar ( Vol. 1 ) [ M ]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
  • 9Schmidt, G. et al. Beyond laterality: A critical assessment of research on the neural basis of metaphor [ J ]. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2010(16) : 1-5.
  • 10Torreano, L. , C. Cristina. and G. Sam. When dogs can fly: Level of abstraction as a cue to metaphorical use of verbs[J]. Metaphor and Symbol, 2005, 20(4) : 259-274.

共引文献53

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部