期刊文献+

盐酸替罗非班在急性心肌梗死患者介入治疗中的临床研究 被引量:13

Efficacy and safety of tirofiban for percutancous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价盐酸替罗非班在急性ST段抬高心肌梗死(STEMI)患者冠状动脉介入治疗中的疗效和安全性。方法将310例接受冠状动脉急诊介入治疗的STEMI患者随机分为实验组和对照组各155例,均使用阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和肝素,实验组加用盐酸替罗非班,比较两组梗死相关血管开通后血流情况、ST段回落幅度、左室射血分数(LVEF)、住院期间主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率及出血、血小板减少等不良反应。结果与对照组比较,实验组校正TIMI帧数、无复流现象(TIMI 0~1级)降低(P均<0.05),术后90 min ST段回落幅度及术后1周LVEF值较高(P均<0.05)。两组MACE及不良反应发生率无统计学差异(P均>0.05)。结论急诊PCI前静脉应用盐酸替罗非班可以降低无复流发生率。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirofiban for coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Methods A total of 310 STEMI patients accepted emergency coronary intervention were randomly divided into 155 cases of tirofiban group and 155 patients of control group.Both groups were used aspirin,Plavix(clopidogrel) and common eparin,experimental group were used tirofeiban.Comparing effects of the tirofiban group and control group on blood flow after infarction,ST down range,postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),adverse effects(bleeding,thrombocytopenia) and adverse cardiovascular events during hospital.Results Comparing with the control group,corrected TIMI frame count and no-reflow phenomenon reduced(P〈0.05),ST down rang in 90 days and LVEF in 1 week were higher(P〈0.05).The incidence of MACE between the two groups had no statistically significant.Conclusion The patients suffering acute myocardial infarction who were used tirofiban is safe and effective.
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 2012年第4期33-35,共3页 Shandong Medical Journal
关键词 急性心肌梗死 盐酸替罗非班 血小板糖蛋白GPⅡb/Ⅲa acute myocardial infarction tirofiban platelet glycoprotein Ⅱ b/Ⅲa
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Limbruno U, Micheli A, De Carlo M, et al. Mechanical preventionof distal embolization during primary angioplasty: safety, feasibility, and impact on myocardial reperfusion [ J ]. Circulation, 2003,108 (2) :171-176.
  • 2Gibson CM, Cannon-CP, Daley WL, et al. TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow [ J ]. Circulation, 1996,93 (5) :879-888.
  • 3Schr der R, Dissmann R, Brtlggemann T, et al. Extent of early ST segment elevation resolution: a simple but strong predictor of out- come in patients with acute myocardial infarction [ J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 1994,24(2) :384-391.
  • 4郭来敬,唐强,胡大一.国产盐酸替罗非班在急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中临床应用的研究[J].临床荟萃,2006,21(23):1697-1700. 被引量:15
  • 5Danzi GB, Capuano C, Sesana M, et al. Variability in extent of platelet function inhibition after administration of optimal dose of glycoprotein Ⅱ b/Ⅲ a receptor blockers in patients undergoing a highrisk percutaneous coronary intervention [ J ]. Am J Cardiol, 2006, 97(4) :489-493.
  • 6Steen H, Lehrke S, Wiegand UK, et al. Very early cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for quantification of myocardial tissue perfusion in patients receiving tirofiban before percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction [ J ]. Am Heart J, 2005, 149 (3) :564-570.
  • 7Boersma E, Harrington RA, Moliterno D J, et al. Platelet glycoprotein Ⅱ b/Ⅲ a inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of all major randomised clinical trials [ J ]. Lancet, 2002,359 (9302) : 189-198.

二级参考文献6

  • 1Lefkovittz J,Plow EF,Topol EJ.Platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲareceptor antagonists trial[J].Eur Heart J,1999,I(suppl E):18-26.
  • 2Montalescot G,Borentain M,Payot L,et al.Early vs late administration of glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibition in primary percutaneous coronary intervention of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction:a meta-analysis[J].JAMA,2004,292(3):362-366.
  • 3Yan HB,Ke YN.ACC/AHA Guidelines for the management of patients with coronary heart disease[M].Beijing:China Environmental Science Press,2004.310-475.
  • 4The PRISM-PLUS Study Investigators.Inhibition of the platelet glycoprotein Ⅱ b/Ⅲ a receptor with tirofiban in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction[J].N Engl J Med,1998,338(21):1488-1497.
  • 5Keeley EC,Boura JA,Grines CL,et al.Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction:a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials[J].Lancet,2003,361 (9351):13-20.
  • 6Kleiman NS,Ohnman EM,Califf RM,et al.Profound inhibition of platelet aggregation with monoclonal antibody 7E3 Fab after thrombolytic therapy:result of thrombolysis and angioplasty in myocardial infarction (TAMI) 8 pilot study[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1993,22(3):381-389.

共引文献14

同被引文献99

  • 1尹宇杰.院前急救采用替罗非班治疗老年急性冠状动脉综合征的有效性和安全性[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(7):1741-1742. 被引量:2
  • 2唐强,郭来敬,张树和,王智,曲华清,颜东,唐群中,史震涛.盐酸替罗非班在ST段抬高急性心肌梗死急诊PCI中的安全性分析[J].心肺血管病杂志,2007,26(1):21-23. 被引量:27
  • 3吴士礼,包宗明,张恒,史晓俊,王洪巨.血浆脑钠尿肽及TIMI危险评分对急性心肌梗死患者的预后价值[J].心脏杂志,2007,19(1):60-61. 被引量:5
  • 4叶任高.内科学[M]5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.258.
  • 5杨燕辉.急性心肌梗死患者脑钠肽水平的变化与意义临床研究[J] .临床与实验医学杂志,2010,9(14):1905.
  • 6Kuliczkowski W,Urbaniak J,Hallén J,et al.Matrix metalloproteinases and the activity of their tissue inhibitors in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty[J] .Kardiol Pol,2013,71(5):453-463.
  • 7Dominguez-Rodriguez A,Abreu-Gonzalez P,Avanzas P,et al.Neopterin predicts left ventricular remodeling in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J] .Atherosclerosis,2010,211(2):574-578.
  • 8Guidez T,Maréchaux S,Pinon C,et al.Addition of B-type natriuretic peptide to the GRACE score to predict outcome in acute coronary syndrome:a retrospective (development) and prospective (validation) cohort-based study[J] .Emerg Med J,2012,29(4):274-279.
  • 9Kruszewski K,Scott AE,Barclay JL,et al.Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressure after acute myocardial infarction:a prospective study of the relative prognostic utility of clinical assessment,echocardiography,and B-type natriuretic peptide[J] .Am Heart J,2010,159(1):47-54.
  • 10国产血小板Ⅱb/Ⅲa受体拮抗剂盐酸替罗非班治疗冠状动脉支架植入术后急性血栓形成的临床观察/药物洗脱支架(Cypher TM)在急性心肌梗死中的临床应用/超声心动图在急诊冠状动脉腔内扩张术的应用价值[J]. 中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(z1):177-178.

引证文献13

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部