期刊文献+

考虑人及组织因素的航天工程项目风险分析模型 被引量:2

Risk Analysis Model of Aerospace Engineering ProjectIncorporating Human and Organization Factors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对人及组织因素是造成航天工程项目风险的重要原因,在揭示了人及组织因素产生航天工程项目风险的机理基础上,构建了考虑人及组织因素的航天工程项目风险分析模型。模型首先评价人及组织因素对航天工程元器件建造工作质量的影响,接着测度工作质量与不同缺陷类型之间的一致性概率,并应用Poisson分布计算缺陷严重性,最后根据贝叶斯定理对元器件先验失效率进行修正,通过一个经过数据处理的航天工程项目对所构建的模型和方法进行了验证。 The mechanism of project risk caused by human and organization factors was revealed, and a model of risk analysis for aerospace engineering project incorporating the human and organization factors based on the mechanism was proposed. Based on the model, the quality of spacecraft component manufacturing considering the human and organization factors was evaluated, and then the consistency probability between the operational task quality and the different types of defect was assessed, and the defect severity was calculated according to Poisson distribution. Finally, the prior default rate of component was updated based on Bayesian theorem. The model framework was validated by an aerospace engineering project with modified data.
出处 《中国空间科学技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期60-65,76,共7页 Chinese Space Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(70903017) 高等学校博士点基金(20092302120012) 黑龙江省自然科学基金(QC2010087)资助项目
关键词 风险分析 人及组织因素 贝叶斯定理 航天工程项目 Risk analysis Aerospace engineering project Human and organization factors Bayesian theorem
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1PATE CORNELL M E. Organizational aspects of engineering system safety: the case of offshore platforms [J]. Science, 1990, 250(12): 1210-1217.
  • 2MURPHY D, PATE CORNELL M E. The SAM framework.. A systems analysis approach to modeling the effects of management on human behavior in risk analysis[J]. Risk Analysis, 1996, 16 (4): 501-515.
  • 3NASA. NASA systems engineering handbook[S]. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C., 1995: 15.
  • 4VAUGHAN D. The challenger launch decision [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996: 8-20.
  • 5NASA. Report of columbia accident investigation board: Volume 1 [R]. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 2003: 178-194.
  • 6USDOD. Military standard procedures for performing a failure mode, effects and criticality analysis [S]. United States Department of Defense, Washington, D.C. , 1980: 1-10.
  • 7HOWARD R. Microrisks for medical decision analysis[J]. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1989, 5 (3): 357-370.
  • 8PATE CORNELL M E, ROBIN L DILLON. Probabilistic risk analysis for the NASA space shuttle: a brief history and current work [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2001, 74 (3): 345-352.
  • 9SWAIN A D, GUTTMANN H E. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications [S]. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983: 221-256.
  • 10LAW M AVERILL, KELTON W DAVID. Simulation modeling and analysis [M]. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000: 58-61.

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部