期刊文献+

缺位与还原:被害人在刑事执行程序中的地位探究 被引量:2

The Vacancy and Restoration of Status of Victims in the Criminal Execution Procedure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 被害人在刑事诉讼程序中的每一个环节均起到举足轻重的作用,然而我国刑事执行程序却将被害人排除在外。被害人在执行程序中地位的缺失不仅与其当事人的地位相矛盾,也与被害人在执行程序中地位的历史发展规律不符。被害人参与刑事执行程序可以彰显人的尊严,是程序参与性与主体性的内在要求,也是实现刑罚功能的需要。我国立法应该确立被害人在刑事执行程序中的主体地位,执行程序的诉讼化改造和被害人的理性化参与是确保被害人在执行阶段主体地位得以实现的保障。 The victim is very important for each proced been excluded in the criminal execution procedure in China. ure in criminal procedure. However, the victim has The status of the victim in the absence of the imple- mentation of the program is inconsistent not only with the status of the parties, but also with the rule of the histor- ical development law of the status of the victim in the implementation of the program. Participation of victims in the criminal execution procedure can manifest the human rights and be an inherent requirement of the procedure participation and subjectivity. It is also the need for realizing the penalty function. China's legislation should establish the principal status of the victim in the criminal execution procedure. Reconstruction of litigation in execution procedure and rational participation of the victim are the safeguards to ensure the principal status of victims in the execution procedure.
机构地区 湘潭大学法学院
出处 《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期70-74,共5页 Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 被害人 刑事执行程序 地位 victims criminal execution procedure status
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1[12][德]汉斯·约阿希姆·施奈德.国际范围内的被害人[M].许章润等译.北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,1992.
  • 2[6][法]米海依尔·戴尔马斯-马蒂.刑事政策的主要体系[M].卢建平,译.北京:法律出版社,2000:
  • 3[7][美]A · Karmen:Crime Victims:An Introduction to Victimology[M].Brooks/ Cole Publishing Company,1989.
  • 4[9]陈光中,郑旭.追求刑事诉讼价值的平衡--英俄近年刑事司法改革述评[N].法制日报,2002-12-19(11).
  • 5[15]最高人民法院研究建立刑事被害人国家救助制度[N].新京报,2007-01-08.
  • 6[德]汉斯·海因里希·耶赛克 徐久生译.德国刑法教科书[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2001..
  • 7约翰·罗尔斯著 何怀宏等译.《正义论》[M].中国社会科学出版社,1988年版.第3、7—8、56页.
  • 8[意]加罗法洛.犯罪学[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1996..
  • 9Jerry L. Mashaw,Administrative Due Prooess the Quest for a Dignitary Theory, in Boron Universiry Law Reres, Vol.61,1981.
  • 10Jerry L. Mashaw,Due Prooess in the Administrative State,1985 by Yale University Press.

共引文献1303

同被引文献17

  • 1[意]皮罗·克拉玛德雷.程序与民主[M].翟小波,刘刚译.北京:高等教育出版社,2006.
  • 2[美]汉密尔顿.联邦党人文集[M].商务印书馆,1995.
  • 3[德] 卡尔·拉伦茨.德国民法通论(上)[M].王晓晔,邵建东,等,译,法律出版社,2003,228-230.
  • 4[日]谷口安平著 王亚新等译.程序的正义与诉讼[M].中国政法大学出版社,1996.P 270.
  • 5朱朝亮等.刑事诉讼之运作[M].台北:五南图书出版公司,1997.
  • 6蔡碧玉.检察手记:你所不知道的台湾检察官[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2013.
  • 7Groenhuijsen and Letschert. Legal Reform on Behalf of Vic- tims of Crime: the Primacy of the Dutch Legislature in a Changing International Environment? Tilburg Law School Studies Research Paper Series ( No. 02 ) 2011.
  • 8Edna Erez, Victim Voice , Impact Statement and Senten- cing: Integrating Restorative Justice and Therapeutic Juris- prudence Principles in Adversary Proceedings. 40Crim. L. Bull (2004) ,490 - 91.
  • 9Snyderv.Massachusetts,291U.S.122(1934).
  • 10Marc Groenhuijsen and Tijs Kooijmans. The Reform of the Dutch Code of Criminal Procedure in Comparative Perspec- tive, Martinus Nijhoff Publish,2012.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部