基于模糊综合的机载超短波通信系统效能分析被引量：3

Effectiveness Analysis of Airborne Ultrashort Wave Communication System Based on Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation

下载PDF

导出

摘要评估具有多个因素的某机载超短波通信系统的效能。构建了机载超短波通信系统的效能指标体系,结合层次分析思想和模糊综合评判模型,通过工程经验和专家评定构造判决矩阵并选取适当的模糊算子进行处理,评估给定系统的效能;并分析比较了不同权重指标因子对系统效能的影响;定量的评估结果表明该机载超短波通信系统效能具有良好等级。 The effectiveness of an airborne ultrashort wave communication system which has some compli- cated factors is analyzed. To analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of the given system, a fuzzy synthetic model combined the analytical hierarchy process （AHP） is built. Using the model and the judicative ma- trix which can be structured based on the experience of projects and expert judgement, analyzes the given system effectiveness and obtains a better evaluation. Finally it discusses the difference of which the system effectiveness is affected by the factors.

作者杨琨刘国政

机构地区中原电子技术研究所

出处《中国电子科学研究院学报》 2012年第1期42-46,共5页 Journal of China Academy of Electronics and Information Technology

关键词模糊综合评判超短波通信效能评估层次分析法模糊算子 fuzzy synthetic evaluation ultrashort wave communication efficiency estimation AHP fuzzy arithmetic operator

分类号 TN915 [电子电信—通信与信息系统]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献6

1BUCKLEY J J. Ranking Alternatives Using Fuzzy Num- bers [ J ]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1985,15 ( 1 ) : 21- 31.
2BARD J F, SOUSK S F. A Tradeoff Analysis for Rough Cargo Handlers Using the AHP: An Example of Group De- cision Making[ C]. Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simu- lation Conference, 2005:2 042-2 051.
3GJBl128A-2002机载超短波电台通用规范[S].2002.
4GJB1145-91军用通信设备定型试验和鉴定试验规程[S].1991.
5朱建军,刘士新,王梦光.一种灵敏度和一致性相结合的决策区域分析[J].控制理论与应用,2004,21(4):537-540. 被引量：4
6邵秋峰 ,马亚龙 ,胡锦川 .模糊合成算子在作战方案综合评估的应用研究[J].装甲兵工程学院学报,2004,18(4):41-43. 被引量：13

二级参考文献12

1许树柏.层次分析法原理[M].天津:天津大学出版社,1986.65-70.
2LIPOVESTSKY S.Interval estimation of priorities in the AHP[J].European J of Operational Research,1999,114(1):153-164.
3OBATA T,SHIRAISHI S.Assessment for an incomplete comparison matrix and improvement of an inconsistent comparison: computational experiments[C]∥Proc of the Fifth Int Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process.[s.l.]:[s.n.],1999.http://www3.toyama-u.ac.jp/～shira/isahp.pdf,1999.
4SAATY T L.Decision making with the AHP:why is the principal eigenvector necessary[J].European J of Operational Research,2003,145(1):85-91.
5XU Z.On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgment matrix in AHP[J].European J of Operational Research,2000,126(3):683-687.
6LIPOVESTSKY S,CONKLIN W M.Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP[J].European J of Operational Research,2002,137(1):110-122.
7XU Z,WEI C P.A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process[J].European J of Operational Research,1999,116(2): 443-449.
8Saaty T L.The seven pillars of the analytic hierarchy process[C]∥Proc of the Fifth Int Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process.[s.l.]:[s.n.],1999.http://www.isahp2003.net/menus/about-ahp/Japan-ta.pdf,1999.
9HURLEY W J.The analytic hierarchy process: a note on an approach to sensitivity which preserves rank order[J].Computers & Operations Research,2001,28(2):185-188.
10FARKAS A.Data perturbations of matrices of pair wise comparisons[J].Annals of Operations Research,2001,101(1):401-425.