期刊文献+

PET、PET:CT与磁共振弥散加权成像在肿瘤诊断中的对比研究进展 被引量:2

Progression of comparison study between PET or PET-CT and magnetic resonance diffusion-weightedimaging in the investigation of tumor
原文传递
导出
摘要 PET—CT和磁共振弥散加权成像是两类检测恶性肿瘤的重要成像方法,前者提供肿瘤组织的功能代谢信息,比如葡萄糖代谢、氨基酸代谢等信息,后者反映水分子的运动状况,二者各有优缺点及适应证,二者有机结合能够对病变获得尽可能多的形态学与代谢学信息,有利于病变的局部定性和系统分期,显著提高诊断的准确率,为临床选择最优化的治疗方案提供最有效的信息。 PET-CT and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI) are two types important imaging modalities in tumor detection, the former could provide functional metabolism information, such as glucose melabolism, amino acids metabolism and so on. While the latter could offer the water molecules motion information in tissues. The two modalities both have advantages, disadvantages and indi- cations of themselves. We will obtain more morphology and metabolism informations while the two modali- ties were combined favorably. The combination of the two were useful to decide the quality of local lesions and systematic stage, and to increase the diagnostic accuracy, that could provide the most effective informations for clinic to choose optimal treatment plan.
出处 《国际放射医学核医学杂志》 2011年第6期339-346,共8页 International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine
关键词 肿瘤 诊断 鉴别 正电子发射断层显像术 体层摄影术 X线计算机 磁共振 成像 弥散 Neoplasms Diagnosis, differential Positron-emission tomography Tomography, X-raycomputed Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献104

  • 1孙晓蓉,邢力刚,于金明,付政,马莉,赵书强,陈鲁生,李文武,杨国仁.肺部肿瘤PET/CT同机图像融合精度研究[J].中华核医学杂志,2004,24(5):302-304. 被引量:11
  • 2郑晓林,徐辉雄,吕明德,谢晓燕,徐作峰.扩散加权MRI定性诊断肝脏局灶性病变的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(2):173-176. 被引量:67
  • 3赵军,林祥通.关于PET/CT临床应用的若干问题[J].中华核医学杂志,2005,25(2):69-71. 被引量:17
  • 4张赟,梁碧玲,高立,钟镜联,叶瑞心,沈君.磁共振弥散加权成像诊断颈部淋巴结的临床价值[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2007,29(1):70-73. 被引量:48
  • 5Garlick PB, Marsden PK, Cave AC, et al. PET and NMR dual acquisition (PANDA): applications to isolated, perfused rat hearts [J]. NMR Biomed, 1997, 10(3): 138-142.
  • 6Shao Y, Cherry SR, Farahani K, et al. Simultaneous PET and MR imaging[J]. Phys Med Biol, 1997, 42(10): 1965-1970.
  • 7Mackewn JE, Strul D, Hallett WA, et al. Design and development of an MR compatible PET scanner for imaging small animals [J]. IEEE Trans Nuel Sei, 2005, 52(5): 1376-1380.
  • 8Shaw NR, Ansorge RE, Carpenter TA. Commissioning and testing of split coil MRI system for combined PET-MR[C]//International society for magnetic resonance in medicine, May 7-13, 2005, Miami Beach, FL, USA.
  • 9Pichler B, Lorenz E, Mirzoyan R, et al. Performance test of a LSOAPD PET module in a 9.4 Tesla magnet [C]//Conference Record of the 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1998: 1237-1239.
  • 10Pichler BJ, Pimpl W, Buttler W, et al. Integrated low-noise low- power fast charge-sensitive preamplifier for avalanche photodiodes in JFET-CMOS technology[J]. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci, 2001, 48(6): 2370-2374.

共引文献83

同被引文献36

  • 1徐跃,梁碧玲.医学影像没备学.3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:191.
  • 2Delso G, Ziegler S. PET/MRI system design. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2009, 36(Suppl 1):$86-$92.
  • 3Kitajima K, Suenaga Y, Ueno Y, et al. Value of fusion of PET and MRI for staging of endometrial cancer: Comparison with 18F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and dynamic contrast- enhanced pelvic MRI. Eur J Radiol, 2013, 82:1672-1676.
  • 4Grueneisen J, Schaarschmidt BM, Heubner M, et al. Implemen- tation of FAST-PET/MRI for whole-body staging of female pa- tients with recurrent pelvic malignancies: A comparison to PET/ CT. Eur J Radiol, 2015,84: 2097-2102.
  • 5Xin J, Ma Q, Guo Q, et al. PET/MRI with diagnostic MR se- quences vs PET/CT in the detection of abdominal and pelvic cancer.Eur J Radiol, 2016, 85:751-759.
  • 6Beiderwellen K, Grueneisen J, Ruhlmann V, et al. [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI vs. PET/CT for whole-body staging in patients with recurrent malignancies of the female pelvis:Initial results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2015, 42:56-65.
  • 7Nakajo K, Tatsumi M, Inoue A, et al. Diagnostic performanceof fluorodeoxyglucose positronemission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging fusion images of gynecological malignant tumors:Comparison with positronemission tomography/com- puted tomography.Jpn J Radiol, 2010, 28:95-100.
  • 8Polterauer S, Grimm C, Hofstetter G, et al. Nomogram predic- tion for overall survival of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer. Br J Cancer, 2012, 107: 918-924.
  • 9Schwarz JK, Grigsby PW, Dehdashti F, et al. The role of 18F- FDG PET in assessing therapy response in cancer of the cervix and ovaries. J Nucl Med, 2009,50(suppl 1): 64S-73S.
  • 10Sun H, Xin J, Zhang S, et al. Anatomical and functional volume concordance between FDG PET, and T2 and diffusion-weighted MRI for cervical cancer: A hybrid PET/MR study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2014, 41:898-905.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部