期刊文献+

MRI及临床急性生理和慢性健康评估Ⅲ评分系统评价急性胰腺炎严重程度的研究 被引量:6

MRI versus acute physiology and chronic healthy evaluation HI score for the assessment of the severity of acute pancreatitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 应用MRI及临床急性生理和慢性健康评估Ⅲ(APACHEⅢ)评分系统评价急性胰腺炎(AP)的严重程度,并探讨两者的相关性.方法 回顾性分析100例AP患者的临床资料及MRI表现,采用MR严重程度指数(MRSI)进行评分,分为轻度(0~3分)、中度(4~6分)、重度(7~10分)AP.并按照临床APACHEⅢ评分,分为轻型(<35分)和重型(≥35分)AP,记录100例AP患者并发症发生率、入住重症监护病房(ICU)及住院天数等情况,采用Spearman等级相关分析法分析MRSI、APACHEⅢ评分及住院时间的关系,MRSI、APACHEⅢ评分与各项临床结果的比较采用x2检验.结果 100例AP,在MRI上80例表现为水肿型,20例表现为坏死型.MRSI评分显示轻度34例,中度59例,重度7例.APACHEⅢ评分为(24.9±12.2)分,APACHEⅢ<35分者77例,APACHEⅢ≥35分者23例.MRSI评分轻、中、重组之间的局部并发症发生率、系统并发症发生率及ICU入住率的差异均有统计学意义(x2值分别为9.161、19.118和54.767,P值均<0.01);APACHEⅢ评分轻、重型之间系统并发症发生率差异有统计学意义(x2=13.120,P=0.000),而与局部并发症发生率、ICU入住率差异无统计学意义(x2值分别为0.245和2.568,P值均>0.05).MRSI评分同住院时间呈低度相关(r =0.235,P=0.019);APACHEⅢ评分与MRSI评分及与住院时间之间无相关性(r值分别为0.168和0.105,P值均>0.05).结论 MRSI评分和APACHEⅢ评分在评估系统并发症方面有预测作用.MRSI评分在预测局部并发症、是否需要ICU治疗以及患者住院时间长短上优于APACHEⅢ评分. Objective To study the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP) by using MRI and the acute physiology and chronic healthy evaluation Ⅲ (APACHE Ⅲ ) score, and the correlation between corresponding MRI findings and APACHE Ⅲ scores.Methods One hundred patients with AP undergoing abdominal MRI were recruited in the study. The MRI features of acute pancreatitis were recorded. The severity of AP on MRI was graded by MR severity index (MRSI) as mild (0 to 2 points),moderate ( 3 to 6 points) and severe (7 to 10 points).APACHE Ⅲ score was denoted for AP was as mild ( 〈35 points)and severe ( ≥ 35 points).The local and systematic complications,mortality,need to intense care unit (ICU),and hospitalization time were recorded and compared with MRSI and APACHE Ⅲ score.Nonparametric Spearman correlation was calculated for testing the correlation between the MRSI,the APACHE Ⅲ and hospitalization time.The correlation of clinical results with MRSI and APACHE Ⅲ was calculated by x2 test.Results In the 100 patients with AP,there were respectively 80 and 20 patients with edematous and necrotic pancreatitis on MRI.According to MRSI,34,59 and 7 patients had mild,moderate,and severe acute pancreatitis,respectively.The APACHE Ⅲ score was (24.9 ± 12.2) points.Seventy-seven patients had less than 35 points and 23 patients had more than 35 point of APACHE Ⅲ score.There were significant differences in the local complication,systematic complication,need to ICU among the three groups in MRSI score,respectively( x2 =9.161,19.118,54.767;P 〈 0.01 ).There was difference in the systematic complication between mild and severe AP in APACHE Ⅲ score(x2 =13.120,P =0.000),but there were no differences (x2 =0.245,x2 =2.568;P 〉 0.05) in the local complication,need to ICU between mild and severe AP in APACHE Ⅲ score.There was weak correlation ( r =0.235,P =0.019 )between MRSI score and hospitalization time,and no difference (r =0.168,0.105; P 〉 0.05)between APACHE Ⅲ and MRSI,APACHE Ⅲ and hospitalization time,respectively.Conclusions Both MRSI and APACHE Ⅲ score may predict systematic complications. However,MRSI is superior to APACHE Ⅲ in predicting the local complications,need to ICU,and hospitalization time in patients with acute pancreatitis.
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期143-147,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
基金 四川省省属高校科研创新团队建设计划(KYTD201007)
关键词 胰腺炎 磁共振成像 对比研究 Pancreatitis Magnetic resonance imaging Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Knaus WA,Wagner DP,Draper EA,et al.The APACHE Ⅲ prognostic system:risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults.Chest,1991,100:1619-1636.
  • 2黄文庆,张孟贤,王江桥,万震威.APACHEⅢ评分对重危患者病情预后评估的价值[J].中国危重病急救医学,2000,12(11):694-695. 被引量:26
  • 3蒙健军,赵晓琴,曹杰,甘廷庆.APACHEⅢ评分在急诊ICU中的应用评价[J].中国危重病急救医学,2003,15(4):236-237. 被引量:20
  • 4Nouira S,Belghith M,Elatrous S,et al.Predictive value of severity scoring systems:comparison of four models in Tunisian adult intensive care units.Crit Care Med,1998,26:852-859.
  • 5徐方元,陈爽,韩云学,陈晓荣,叶春梅,顾莉芳,范大胜,叶春燕.急性胰腺炎腹膜后间隙受累的CT表现与临床严重程度的相关性分析[J].临床放射学杂志,2010,29(10):1368-1371. 被引量:9
  • 6宋彬,徐隽.急性胰腺炎的CT评价[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2003,10(6):623-626. 被引量:20
  • 7Stimac D,Mileti D,Radi M,et al.The role of nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the early assessment of acute pancreatitis.Am J Gastroenterol,2007,102:997-1004.
  • 8Viremouneix L,Monneuse O,Gautier G,et al.Prospective evaluation of nonenhanced MR imaging in acute pancreatitis.J Magn Reson Imaging,2007,26:331-338.
  • 9潘华山,张小明.急性胰腺炎的MRI评价[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2010,33(1):34-37. 被引量:14
  • 10Tang W,Zhang XM,Xiao B,et al.Magnetic resonance imaging versus acute physiology and chronic healthy evaluation Ⅱ score in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis.Eur J Radiol,2010,80:637-642.

二级参考文献38

共引文献126

同被引文献51

  • 1Xiao, Bo,Zhang, Xiao-Ming,Tang, Wei,Zeng, Nan-Lin,Zhai, Zhao-Hua.Magnetic resonance imaging for local complications of acute pancreatitis: A pictorial review[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(22):2735-2742. 被引量:19
  • 2梁宗辉,冯晓源,祝瑞江,金忱.正常胰腺的多层螺旋CT灌注成像研究[J].生物医学工程与临床,2006,10(4):218-222. 被引量:25
  • 3刘铁,张亮亮,祝跃明,吴晓,宣浩波,魏君玉.急性胰腺炎CT诊断[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,1996,2(3):177-179. 被引量:2
  • 4黎昕,蓝博文,李丽红,等.肾旁后间隙和胃裸区受累CT征象在评估急性胰腺炎严重程度中的价值[J].影像诊断与介人放射学,2012,21(2):118-121.
  • 5赵志新.MRI评分和Ranson标准在急性胰腺炎严重程度早期评估中的比较[J].中华危重症医学杂志,2012,5(5):31-33.
  • 6中华医学会消化病学分会胰腺疾病学组,中华胰腺病杂志编辑委员会.中华消化杂志编辑委员会.中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2013年,上海)[J].中华消化杂志,2013,33:217-222.
  • 7Talukdar R, Bhattacharrya A, Rao B, et al. Clinical utility of the revised atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis in a prospective cohort: have all loose ends been tied? [J]. Pancreatology,2014,14 (4) :257-262.
  • 8van Santvoort H C, Bakker O J, Bollen T L, et al. A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis im proves outcome[J]. Gastroenterology, 2011,141 (4) : 1254- 1263.
  • 9Mounzer R, Langmead C J, Wu B U, et al. Comparison of existing clinical scoring systems to predict persistent organ failure in patients with acute pancreatitis[J]. Gastroenterology,2012,142(7) : 1476- 1482.
  • 10Mortele K J,Wiesner W, Intriere L, et al. A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis:improved correlation with patient outcome[J]. AJR,2004,183(5) :1261-1265.

引证文献6

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部