期刊文献+

早期应用大剂量替罗非班对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者急诊介入术后血小板聚集功能及活性的影响 被引量:38

Effect of early high-loading-dose tirofiban on platelet activity in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨早期应用大剂量替罗非班对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者急诊介入术后血小板聚集功能及活性的影响.方法 入选120例急性STEMI拟行急诊介入治疗的患者,在给予负荷剂量的阿司匹林(300 mg)和氯吡格雷(600 mg)后,于冠状动脉造影前随机分为大剂量组(替罗非班25 μg/kg静脉推注,继之以0.15 μg·kg-1·min-1静脉维持泵入36 h,共40例)、常规剂量组(替罗非班10 μg/kg静脉推注,继之以0.15 μg·kg-1·min-1静脉维持泵人36 h,共40例)和对照组(不应用替罗非班,共40例).分别于入选后即刻、替罗非班应用后10 min和24 h、停用替罗非班后12和24 h抽血,采用血栓弹力图测定血小板聚集功能的抑制率(IPA)及活性.结果 3组之间的入选后即刻IPA差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).替罗非班应用后10 min,大剂量组的IPA显著高于常规剂量组和对照组[(84.2±12.0)%比(67.8±26.8)%和(31.5±21.9)%,P均<0.01].替罗非班应用后24 h,大剂量组及常规剂量组对血小板聚集的抑制水平达到高峰,IPA分别为(93.0±9.8)%和(88.5±18.1)%,两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),且均显著高于对照组[(40.4±22.8)%,P均<0.01].停用替罗非班后12和24 h,3组之间的IPA差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05).大剂量组与常规剂量组之间不同时间的血小板活性差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05).替罗非班应用10 min和24 h后,大剂量组和常规剂量组的血小板活性均低于对照组[分别为(47.2±7.6)mm和(50.0 ±9.8)mm比(57.7±6.5) mm,P均<0.01;(54.6±5.6) mm和(54.3 ±9.0) mm比(59.6 ±4.0)mm,P均<0.01].结论 对于急性STEMI行急诊介入治疗的患者,早期应用大剂量替罗非班可能较常规剂量能更好地抑制血小板聚集和活性. Objective To investigate the effect of early high-loading-dose tirofiban on platelet activity for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.Methods A total of 120 acute STEMI patients were treated with 300 mg aspirin and 600 mg loading dose clopidogrel and randomized to high-dose tirofiban (25 μg/kg bolus followed by0.15 μg · kg-1 · min-1 infusion for 36 hours,n =40),standard-dose tirofiban (10 μg/kg bolus followed by 0.15 μg · kg-1 · min-1 infusion for 36 hours,n =40) or control (no tirofiban,n =40) before angiography.Inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) was assessed before angiography,at 10 min and 24 hours after tirofiban infusion, and at 12 and 24 hours after stopping tirofiban infusion by the thrombelastography assay.Results There was no significant difference in baseline of IPA between the 3 groups (P 〉 0.05 ).IPA was significantly higher in high-dose tirofiban group compared with standard-dose tirofiban and no tirofiban group at 10 minutes after tirofiban infusion [ ( 84.2 ± 12.0 ) % vs.( 67.8 ±26.8 ) % and (31.5 ± 21.9) %,all P 〈 0.01 ].At 24 hours after tirofiban infusion,the IPA of high-dose and standard-dose tirofiban was similar [ ( 93.0 ± 9.8 ) % vs. ( 88.5 ± 18.1 ) %,P 〉 0.05 ] and was significantly higher than no tirofiban group [ (40.4 ± 22.8 ) %,all P 〈 0.01 ].IPA was similar at 12 and 24 hours after stopping tirofiban use among the 3 groups( all P 〉 0.05 ).The maximum amplitude of high-dose tirofiban and standard-dose tirofiban groups at different time points was similar( all P 〉 0.05),and maximum amplitude in both tirofiban groups was significantly lower than in no tirofiban group at 10 min [ (47.2 ± 7.6)mm and (50.0 ± 9.8 ) mm vs.(57.7 ± 6.5 ) mm,all P 〈 0.01 ] and at 24 hours after stopping tirofiban infusion [ (54.6 ± 5.6 )mm and ( 54.3 ± 9.0) mm vs.(59.6 ± 4.0) mm,all P 〈 0.01 ].Conclusion Early use of high-loading-dose of tirofiban on top of 600 mg loading dose clopidogrel is more efficient on inhibiting platelet activity than standard dose of tirofiban in patients with acute STEMI undergoing primary primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
出处 《中华心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期131-135,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cardiology
关键词 心肌梗死 血小板聚集抑制剂 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 Myocardial infarction Platelet aggregation inhibitors Angioplasty, transluminal,percutaneous coronary
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Boersma E, Harrington RA, Moliterno D J, et al. Platelet glycoprotein Ⅱ b/Ⅲ a inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes:a meta-analysis of all major randomised clinical trials.Lancet,359:189-198.
  • 2杨新春,张大鹏,王乐丰,徐立,葛永贵,王红石,李惟铭,倪祝华,夏昆,连勇,薛永利,马利祥.冠状动脉内应用国产替罗非班对急性ST段抬高心肌梗死急诊介入治疗后心肌灌注和临床预后的影响[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(6):517-522. 被引量:73
  • 3Steinhubl SR, Talley JD, Braden GA, et al. Point-of-care measured platelet inhibition correlates with a reduced risk of an adverse cardiac event after percutaneous coronary intervention:results of the GOLD (AU-Assessing Ultegra) multicenter study.Circulation,2001,103:2572-2578.
  • 4Batchelor WB, Tolleson TR, Huang Y, et al. Randomized comparison of platelet inhibition with abciximab,tirofiban and eptifibatide during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: the COMPARE trial. Comparison of measurements of platelet aggregation with aggrastat,reopro,and eptifibatide.Circulation,2002,106:1470-1476.
  • 5Topol EJ,Moliterno DJ,Herrmann HC,et al.Comparison of two platelet glycoprotein Ⅱ b/Ⅲa inhibitors,tirofiban and abciximab,for the prevention of ischemic events with percutaneous coronary revascularization.N Engl J Med,2001,344:1888-1894.
  • 6Ernst NM,Suryapranata H,Miedema K,et al.Achieved platelet aggregation inhibition after different antiplatelet regimens during percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,44:1187-1193.
  • 7Danzi GB,Sesana M,Capuano C,et al.Comparison in patients having primary coronary angioplasty of abciximab versus tirofiban on recovery of left ventricular function.Am J Cardiol,2004,94:35-39.
  • 8Valgimigli M, Campo G,Percoco G,et al. Comparison of angioplasty with infusion of tirofiban or abciximab and with implantation of sirolimus-eluting or uncoated stents for acute myocardial infarction:the multistrategy randomized trial.JAMA,2008,299:1788-1799.
  • 9Valgimigli M,Percoco G,Malagutti P,et al. Tirofiban and sirolimus-eluting stent vs abciximab and bare-metal stent for acute myocardial infarction:a randomized trial.JAMA,2005,293:2109-2117.
  • 10De Luca G, Ucci G,Cassetti E,et al. Benefits from small molecule administration as compared with abciximab among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty:a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol,2009,53:1668-1673.

二级参考文献22

  • 1Brener SJ, Barr LA, Burehenal JE, et al. Randomized, placebocontrolled trial of platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa blockade with primary PTCA Organization and Randomized Trial (RAPPORT). Circulation, 1998, 98 (8) : 734-741.
  • 2Montalescot G, Barragan P, Wittenberg O, et al. For the ADMIRAL Investigators. Platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibition with coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction. N Eng J Med, 2001, 344 ( 25 ) : 1895-1903.
  • 3Stone GW, Grines CL, Cox DA, et al. Comparision of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acuete myocardial infarction. N Eng J Med, 2002, 346(13): 957-966.
  • 4Neuman FJ, Kastrati A, Schmitt C, et al. Effect of glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor blockade with abciximab on clinical and angiographic restenosis rate after of coronary stents following acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardial, 2000,35(4) :915-921.
  • 5Platelet receptor inhibition in ischemic syndrome management (PRISM) study investigators. A comparison of aspirin plus tirofiban with aspirin plus heparin for unstable angina. N Engl J Med, 1998,338(21) : 1498-1505.
  • 6Platelet receptor inhibition in ischemic syndrome management in patients limited by unstable sign and symptoms (PRISM-PLUS) study investigators. Inhibition of the platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor with tirofiban in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med, 1998,338 (21) : 1488- 1497.
  • 7The RESTORE Investigators. Effects ,of platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa blockade with tirofiban on adverse cardiac events in patients with unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty. Circulation, 1997, 96(5) : 1445-1453.
  • 8Uyarel H, Uzunlar B, Unal Dayi S, et al. Effect of Tirofiban Therapy on ST Segment Resolution and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with ST Segment Elevated Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Angioplasty. Cardiology,2006,105 (3) : 168- 175.
  • 9Martinez-Rios MA, Rosas M, Gonzalez H, et al. Comparison of reperfusion regimens with or without tirofiban in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol,2004, 93 (3) :280-287.
  • 10Yip HK, Wu CJ, Chang HW, et al. Impact of tirofiban on angiographic morphologic features of high-burden thrombus formation during direct percutaneous coronary intervention and short-term outcomes. Chest, 2003,124(3 ) :962-968.

共引文献72

同被引文献326

引证文献38

二级引证文献289

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部