期刊文献+

常规、中置臭氧活性炭和曝气活性炭工艺处理北江原水对比研究 被引量:2

COMPARISON THE TREATMENT EFFECTS OF TREATING BEIJIANG SOURCE WATER IN CONVENTIONAL O_3-BAC AND MID-POSITIONING O_3-BAC AND AERATION-BAC PROCESS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对比了常规臭氧活性炭、中置臭氧活性炭、曝气活性炭滤池3种不同的工艺对北江顺德水道II~III类水质的净水效果。结果表明,曝气活性炭滤池采用0.2的气水体积比对CODMn的去除效果比常规、中置活性炭的处理效果要好,去除率达45.95%;中置臭氧活性炭工艺对UV254、TOC的去除效果最好,0.5 mg.L-1时去除率分别达66.36%、38.99%;曝气活性炭滤池对于高含量氨氮的去除效果明显优于常规、中置臭氧活性炭滤池,0.4的气水体积比时氨氮去除率达99.43%,出水达到GB 5749-2006要求。 The purification effect of treating Beijiang source water in conventional O3-BAC and mid-positioning O3-BAC and aeration-BAC process were compared. Studies show that: removal effect of CODMn in aeration-BAC with aeration gas-water ratio 0.2 was better than that of in conventional O3-BAC and mid-positioning O3-BAC, the average removal rates of CODMn was 45.95%. UV254 and TOC got best removal effect in mid-positioning O3-BAC with 0.5 mg.L-1 ozone, removal rates was 66.36% and 38.99% respectively. Removal effect of high concentration of NH4+-N is much better in aeration-BAC than that of in the other two processes, removal rates of NI4+ -N was 45.95% when aeration gas-water ratio was 0.4, and the water reached The health standard of living and drinking water.
作者 杨洁 陆少鸣
出处 《水处理技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期94-98,共5页 Technology of Water Treatment
基金 十一五国家水体污染控制与治理重大专项(2009ZX07423-003)
关键词 臭氧 活性炭 臭氧投加量 中置臭氧活性炭 曝气活性炭滤池 O3 activated carbon ozone doses mid-positioning O3-BAC aeration-BAC
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献77

共引文献806

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部