期刊文献+

社区老年慢病患者用药审查干预效果的系统评价 被引量:2

Systematic review of medication review intervention in community-dwelling elderly patients with chronic diseases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:了解国内外关于社区老年慢性病患者的用药审查干预的实施策略、运行进展、干预效果及出现的问题,为开展相关研究提供决策建议。方法:采用系统评价的方法对2005-2010年国内外公开发表的关于老年用药相关问题的用药审查干预的文献进行检索及评价。结果:共计8项研究纳入系统分析,累计干预人群863例,对照人群899例,涉及4个国家;干预的时间为8周~2年;干预的评价指标主要有从用药相关、患者相关、健康及生命质量相关这三个方面。结论:以药师为主导的用药审查对提高患者生命质量、降低住院率和死亡率无显著性影响,对精简用药数量,确定药学服务主题,提高患者药物治疗收益有较好的效果。 Objective To find out the implementation strategy ,operating progress ,intervention effects and problems of medication review of the implementation of intervention strategies, and to provide policy recommendations on related studies. MethodsRelated literatures published home and abroad were systematically reviewed. Results 8 items of study were included,involving 863 cases of intervention population, 899 cases of control population, from 4 different countries. Intervention time was between 8 weeks to 2 years. The main review indexes included the drug--related, patient -- related, health -- and -- quality -- of -- life -- related ones. Conclusion The pharmacist -- led medication review showed a positive influence of reducing potential drug- related problems (DRPs) in the elderly. But it did not significantly improve quality of life or ruduce hospitalization rates and deaths.
出处 《中国农村卫生事业管理》 2012年第2期134-137,共4页 Chinese Rural Health Service Administration
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(NO.21075088) 河北省卫生厅医学科学研究重点项目(NO.20090316)
关键词 社区老年 用药相关问题 用药审查 系统评价 community-- dwelling elderly drug-- related problems (DRPs) medication review systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Strand LM, Morley PC, Cipolle R J, et al. Drug related problems., their structure and function [J]. DICP, 1990, 24:1093-1097.
  • 2Holland R, Desborough J,Goodyer L ,et al. Does pharmacist --led medication review help to reduce hospital admissions and deaths in older people? A systematic review and meta - analysis [J]. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2008,65(3) : 303-316.
  • 3Jadad AR,Moore RA,Carroll D,et al. Assessing the qualityof reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary[J]? ControlClin Trials, 1996,17(1): 1-12.
  • 4Holland R, Lenaghan E, Harvey I, et al. Does home based medication review keep older people out of hospital? The HOMER randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ , 2005,330 : 29:3-297.
  • 5Zermansky AG, Alldred DP, Petty DR, et al. Clinical medication review by a pharmacist of elderly people living in care homes--randomised controlled trial[J]. Age Ageing,2006,35 : 586-591.
  • 6Lee JK, Grace KA, Taylor AJ. Effect of a pharmacy care program on medication adherence and persistence, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a randomized controlled trial [J]. JAMA , 2006,296 : 2563- 2571.
  • 7Lenaghan E, Holland R, Brooks A. Home -- based medication review in a high risk elderly population in primary care--the POLYMED randomised controlled tria [J]. Age Ageing, 2007,36 : 292-297.
  • 8Vinks TH, Egberts TCG, De Lange IM, et al. Pharmacist --based medication review reduces potential drug-related problems in the elderly. The SMOG controlled trial [J]. Drug Aging 2009,26: 123-133.
  • 9Ahmad A, Hugtenburg J, Welschen LMC, et al. Effect of medication review and cognitive behaviour treatment by community pharmacists of patients discharged from the hospital on drug related problems and compliance: design of a randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Public Health , 2010,10(1): 133-143.
  • 10倪静,孙艳群,熊颖丽,严孚莹.“四位一体”的用药监护模式对社区老年患者用药依从性的干预研究[J].实用临床医学(江西),2010,11(6):102-103. 被引量:10

二级参考文献8

共引文献9

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部