期刊文献+

结直肠癌术后风险预测模型CCF-CCM的应用进展 被引量:2

Advances in application of Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解结直肠癌术后风险预测模型CCF-CCM的应用进展情况。方法检索CCF-CCM相关文献,进行阅读分析。结果有2篇文献主要与CCF-CCM相关,一篇介绍CCF-CCM的发展,一篇对其进行评论。结论 CCF-CCM专为接受外科手术的结直肠癌患者提供风险评估,用以评估人群中30 d手术死亡风险,经内源性验证发现CCF-CCM准确度较好。但在CCF-CCM为患者提供有意义的信息前,还需要在各中心进行专业验证与校准。在多中心前瞻性研究结果出来之前,该模型还不能用于对患者结果和外科医生能力进行绝对性的测量。 [ Objective] To explore the application of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model (CCF-CCM). [Methods] The articles relevant to the CCF-CCM were searched and reviewed. [Results] There were two papers mostly relevant to the CCF-CCM, one described the development of the CCF-CCM, while the other gave a comment on the accuracy of the CCF-CCM. [Conclusion] The CCF-CCM has been designed specifically for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery in order to predict the risk of 30 day operative mortality. It is founded that the CCF-CCM provides an accurate assessment of operative risk in col- orectal cancer the patients undergoing surgery at the Cleveland Cancer Clinic by internally validating. And this model needs to be specifically validated and calibrated by individual institutions before meaningful information can be obtained and offered to patients. Furthermore, it should not be used as an absolute measure of patient outcomes or a surgeon's competency until a prospective multieenter validation study is carried out.
出处 《中国现代医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期91-94,共4页 China Journal of Modern Medicine
关键词 结直肠癌 手术风险 预测模型 风险评估 colorectal cancer operative risk predictive model risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1FAZIO VW,TEKKIS PP,REMZI F,et al.Assessment of opera-tive risk in colorectal cancer surgery:the Cleveland Clinic Foun-dation colorectal cancer model[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2004,47(12):2015-2024.
  • 2SPIEGELHALTER DJ,AYLIN P,BEST NG,et al.Commis-sioned analysis of surgical performance by using routine data:lessons from Bristol inquiry[J].J R Stat Soc A,2002,165(2):191-221.
  • 3HADORN DC,KEELER EB,ROGERS WH,et al.Assessing the performance of mortality prediction models[M].RAND/UCLA/Har-vard Center for Health Care Financing Policy Research,1993.
  • 4COPELAND GP,JONES D,WALTERS M.POSSUM:a scoring system for surgical audit[J].Br J Surg,1991,78(3):355-360.
  • 5WHITELEY MS,PRYTHERCH DR,HIGGINS B,et al.An e-valuation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system[J].Br J Surg,1996,83(6):812-815.
  • 6KNAUS WA,WAGNER DP,DRAPER EA,et al.The APACHE III prognostic system.Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalised adults[J].Chest,1991,100(6):1619-1636.
  • 7KHURI SF,NAJJAR SF,DALEY J,et al.Comparison of surgi-cal outcomes between teaching and non-teaching hospitals in the department of veterans affairs[J].Ann Surg,2001,234(3):370-382.
  • 8KHURI SF,DALEY J,HENDERSON W,et al.Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care:results of the national veterans affairs surgical risk study[J].J Am Coll Surg,1997,185(4):315-327.
  • 9SAGAR PM,HARTLEY MN,MACFIE J,et al.Comparison of individual surgeon's performance:risk-adjusted analysis with POSSUM scoring system[J].Dis Colon Rectum,1996,39(6):654-658.
  • 10TEKKIS PP,KOCHER HM,BENTLEY AJ,et al.Operative mortality rates among surgeons:comparison of POSSUM and p-POSSUM scoring systems in gastrointestinal surgery[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2000,43(11):1528-1534.

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部