期刊文献+

美国教育公共治理的公共性转型 被引量:2

Public Transition of Reforms on Public Governance of American Education
原文传递
导出
摘要 20世纪80年代以来的美国教育公共治理改革的主要策略,即教育多元中心治理和教育择校的有限尝试,是在学生学业"失败"上升为一个公共问题的条件下,因教育官僚制自身缺陷而必然采取的策略。它并不想整体突破教育官僚制和实现完全的择校自由,而是在持守教育公共性的前提下对教育官僚制缺陷的自我调整和弥补;它不仅仅体现为治理结构的改进,而且更重要的是在卢梭式的追问中实现了更高层次的公共性。从这个意义上看,教育公共治理实现了公共性的转型。对教育公共性的内涵我们需要重新理解。 In the context of failure of student achievement becoming a public problem, multi-governance of education and school choice, which are two major strategies of public governance in education, were adopted since 1980s to deal with the shortcomings of educational bureaucracy. It was not intended to break down the whole educational bureaucracy and fully carry out school choice. Instead, it tries to make self-adjustment and mending of the shortcomings of educational bureaucracy while maintaining the public nature of education. It not only implies the improvement of governance structure, but also achieves a higher level of public feature. In some way, the public nature of educational public governance has made a transition. We need a new view of public nature of education governance.
作者 潘希武
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期13-17,共5页 International and Comparative Education
关键词 美国教育公共治理改革 教育政治 公共性转型 教育官僚制失败 择校制 American reforms of educational public governance educational politics transition of public nature fall of educational bureaucracy school choice
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1弗雷德·里克森.公共行政的精神[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.43-46.
  • 2欧文·休斯.公共管理导论(第二版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.
  • 3Lubienski, Christopher. Public Schools in Marketized Envi- ronments: Shifting Incentives and Unintended Consequences of Competition-Based Educational Reforms, American Journal of Education, 2005, Vol. 111 (4):464-481.
  • 4Bauman, Paul C..Governing Education: Public Sector Reform or Privatization. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1996.169-170.
  • 5Ball, Stephen. Education Reform:A Critical and Post-Struc- tural Approach, Philadephia:Open University Press, 1994. 119.
  • 6Bifulco, Robert & Helen F. Ladd. School Choice, Racial Segregation, and Test-Score Gaps: Evidence from North Carolina' s Charter School Program. Journal of Policy Analy- sis and Management, 2006,26( 1 ): 31-56.
  • 7Witte,John F.. The Market Approach to Education: An Analysis of America's First Voucher Program. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.221.
  • 8Bartlett, Lesley, et al. The Marketization of Education: Public Schools for Private Ends. Anthropology and Educa- tion Quarterly, 2002, Vol.33( 1 ):5-27.
  • 9Bottery, Mike. The Ethics of Educational Management: Personal, Social and Political Perspectives on School Or- ganization, Cassell Educational Limited.1992.7.
  • 10Bartlett, Lesley, et al. The Marketization of Education: Public Schools for Private Ends, Anthropology and Edu- cation Quarterly, 2002,Vol.33 ( 1 ):9-11.

共引文献3

同被引文献33

  • 1姜大源.德国职业教育改革重大举措——德国新《职业教育法》解读[J].中国职业技术教育,2005,21(14):59-61. 被引量:46
  • 2詹姆斯·N·罗西瑙.没有政府的治理[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,2001..
  • 3Good Governance of Early Childhood Care and Education : Lessons from the 2007 EFA GlobalMonitoring Report[R]. UNESCO Policy Briefs on Early Childhood,2007.9.
  • 4Foundation for Child Development. New report: Impact of recession on children to reach newlows in 2010[EB/OL].http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2010^06-08-1Achild08_ST_N.htm.loc=in-terstitialskip#uslPageRetum.
  • 5Martin-Korpi,B.. The politics of pre-school: Intentions and decisions underlying the emer-gence and growth of the Swedish pre-school (3rd edition) [M]. Stockholm: Sweden Ministry of Educa-tion and Research ,2007,61.
  • 6Kagan,S. L. & Kauerz,K.. Governance and Early Childhood Systems:Different Forms,SimilarGoals [A]. Early Childhood Systems:Transforming Early Learning [C]. New York: Teachers CollegePress,2012.12-30.
  • 7Kohler-Koch, B.,& Rittberger, B.. Review article: The “governance turn” in EU studies [J].Journal of Common Market Studies,2006,9(44) :27“49.
  • 8Neuman,M. J.. Governance of early care and education: Politics and policy in France andSweden [ D ]. Columbia : Columbia University, 2007.
  • 9Rigby,E.,Tarrant,K. & Neuman,M. J.. Alternative policy designs and the socio-political con-struction of childcare[J]. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood,2007,8(2) :98-108.
  • 10Kauerz,K. & Kagan,S. L.. Governing American Early Care and Education: Shifting from Gov-ernment to Governance and from Form to Function [A], Continuing issues in early childhood education[C]. Columbus,OH: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall,2008.12-32.

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部