期刊文献+

模糊图片任务中,个体与团体后见之明的研究 被引量:1

An Fuzzy Pictures Task Research of Hindsight Bias, Between the Individual and Group
下载PDF
导出
摘要 后见之明偏差是指个体在知道事情结果之后,过高估计自己事先预测水平的一种偏差现象。本研究以实验法对大学生个体和团体后见之明偏差进行了检验和比较。实验以分层抽样的方法随机选取男女大学生被试各20名,通过所设计的模糊图片辨认任务对被试的后见之明偏差进行了研究。结果显示:个体和团体都表现出了后见之明偏差。个体与团体的后见之明偏差差异不显著;后见之明偏差的性别差异显著,女性后见之明偏差大于男性。 Hindsight bias is individual overestimates the the phenomenon that the probability of the event happen after it was known. This paper is devoted to exporting the distinction of the hindsight bias in indi- vidual and group. 40 participants were selected to measure visual hindsight bias by fuzzy pictures task. The results showed that both the individuals and groups appeared hindsight bias. However, there is no statistical difference between the groups and individu- als; the main effect of the sex is significantly, and women's hindsight bias are more than men's.
作者 杨青 周琼
出处 《社会心理科学》 2012年第2期50-53,128,共5页 Science of Social Psychology
关键词 后见之明 模糊图片 个体 团体 Hindsight Fuzzy picture Individual groups
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1杜建政.后见之明研究综述[J].心理科学进展,2002,10(4):382-387. 被引量:4
  • 2Fischhoff,B.Hindsight≠foresight:The ef-fect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncer-tainty.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,1975,1:288-299.
  • 3Kerr,N.L.,MacCoun,R.J.,&Kramer,G.P.Bias in Judgment:Comparing individuals and groups.Psychological Review,1996,103:687-719.
  • 4Bukszar,E.,&Connolly,T.Hindsight bias and strategic choice:Some problems in learning from ex-perience.Academy of Management Journal,1988,31:628-641.
  • 5Stahlberg,D.,Eller,F.,Maass,A.,&Frey,D.We knew it all along:Hindsight bias in groups.Orga-nizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1995,63:46-58.
  • 6Dong-Won Choi,Incheol Choi.A Compari-son of Hindsight Bias in Groups and Individuals:The Moderating Role of Plausibility.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,2010,40:325-343.
  • 7Rogelberg,S.G.,&Rumery,S.M.Gender diver-sity,team decision quality,time on task,and interper-sonal cohesion.Small Group Research,1996,27:79-90.
  • 8Bernstein,D.M.,Atance,C.,Loftus,G.R.,&Melt-zoff,A.N.We saw it all along:Visual hindsight bias in children and adults.Psychological Science,2004,15,264-267.
  • 9Harley,E.M.,Carlsen,K.,&Loftus,G.R.The“saw it all along”effect:Demonstrations of visual hindsight bias.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,2004,30,960-968.
  • 10庞爱莲,李晓东.听觉后见之明偏差的实验研究[J].心理科学,2010,33(1):104-107. 被引量:5

二级参考文献40

  • 1杜建政.后见之明研究综述[J].心理科学进展,2002,10(4):382-387. 被引量:4
  • 2Fischhoff, B. Hindsight≠Foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975,1:288 - 299.
  • 3Walster. "Second guessing" important events. Human Relation, 1967,20 : 239 - 250.
  • 4Hoffrage, U. , &Pohl, R.F. Research on hindsight bias: A rich pasta productive present, and a challenging future. Momory, 2003,11 : 329 - 335.
  • 5Bemstein, D. M., Atance, C., Loftus, G. R., &Meltzoff, M. We saw it all along visual hindsight bias in children and adults. Psychological Science, 2004,15 : 264 - 267.
  • 6Pohl, R.F., Sehwarz, S., Sczesny, S., &Stahlberg, D.. Hindsight bias: in gustatory judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2003,50:107 - 115.
  • 7El - Sehitya, T., Haumerb, H., Helmensteinc, C., Kirchlerd, E., &Maciejovskye, B. Hindsight bias and individual risk attitude within the context of experimental asset markets. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 2002,1 - 20.
  • 8Hertwin_g, R., Gigerenzer, G., &Hoffrage, U. The reiteration effect in hindsight bias. Psychological Review, 1997,104:194 - 202.
  • 9Musch, J., &Wagner, T. Did everybody know it all along? A review of individual differences in hindsight bias. Social Cognition, 2007,25 : 64 - 82.
  • 10Sannaa, L.J., &Schwarz. Debasing the hindsight bias: The role of accessibility experiences and (miss) attributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2003,39:287 - 295.

共引文献6

同被引文献24

  • 1Lewis M W. Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehen- sive Guide [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25 (4) : 760-776.
  • 2Chen M J, Miller D. The Relational Perspective as a Business Mindset Managerial Implications for East and West [J]. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2011,25 (3) : 6-18.
  • 3Choi I, Nisbett R E. Cultural psychology of surprise: Holistic theories and recognition of contradiction [J]. Journal of Per- sonality and Social Psychology,2000,79(6) : 890-90.
  • 4Nisbett R E. Essence and accident: Back to the future with Ned Jones and the correspondence bias [C]//J Cooper J. Dar- ley. Attribution processes, person perception, and social inter- action : The legacy of Ned Jones. Washington, DC : American Psychological Association, 199.
  • 5Nisbett R E, Peng K, Chol 1, et al. Cuhure and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition [J]. Psychological Re- view, 2001,108(2) :291-310.
  • 6Peng K. Naive Dialecticism and Its Effects on Reasoning and Judgment about Contradiction [D]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1997.
  • 7Peng K, Nisbett R E. Cross-cultural similarities and differ- ences in the understanding of physical causality [M]//Shiled M. Proceedings of conference on culture and science. Frankfort, KY : Kentucky State University Press, 1997.
  • 8Peng K, Nisbett R E. Culture, Dialectics, and Reasoning about Contradiction [J]. American Psychologist, 1999, 54 (9) :741-754.
  • 9Choi I, Nisbett R E, Norenzayan A. Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality [J]. Psychological Bul- letin, 1999,125( 1 ) : 47-63.
  • 10Lowenstein G. The psychology of curiosity: A review and re- interpretation [J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1994, 116 (1) : 75-98.

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部