期刊文献+

心肌造影负荷超声心动图评价存活心肌的临床研究 被引量:2

Assessment of Myocardial Viability in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease by Myocardial Contrast Stress Echocardiography
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:研究心肌造影负荷超声心动图(MCSE)定量心肌血流判断存活心肌的可行性与可靠性。方法:对20例冠心病患者行持续静脉滴注法MCSE,按1:4的比例于收缩末期触发的方式提取图像,采集图像后脱机分析及彩色编码。计算灌注正常区域和灌注缺损区域的A.β值,根据A.β值确定心肌存活与否,将判定结果正电子断层显像(PET)进行对照。结果:17例病人(85%)获得满意图像,灌注正常区和灌注缺损区的A.β值分别为59.32±11.54和5.69±1.78;灌注正常区在Dob 5μg、10μg时的A.β均值分别为69.57±8.13和76.65±13.61,且均高于静息时A.β值,与PET判定坏死的心肌节段一致。结论:MCSE能从血流定量水平判断存活心肌。 Objective: To study the myocardial contrast stress echocardiography(MCSE) for assessment of viable myocardium in patient s with Coronary heart disease(CHD).Methods: Twenty patients with CHD(mean age 55.1 ±12.8years) were studied by MCSE according to the ratio of 1:4 in the way of end-systolic triggering time.Calculation the A·β value of the perfusion of normal region and the perfusion defect area,according to A·βvalue determination of myocardial viability or not,the result of determination of PET control.Results: In 17 patients(85%) obtained a satisfactory image,perfusion of normal and perfusion defect area A·βvalues were 59.32 + 11.54 and 5.69 + 1.78;Perfusion of normal area in Dob 5g,10g,A·βvalue mean were 69.57 + 8.13 and 76.65 + 13.61,are higher than the rest-ing A·βvalue,and PET to determine myocardial necrosis segment alignment.Conclusions: MCSE can evaluate myocardial via-bility from blood flow quantitative level.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2012年第1期112-114,共3页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 福建省青年人才项目基金(2006F3103)
关键词 心肌造影负荷超声心动图 心肌存活性 正电子断层显像 Myocardial contrast stress echocardiography Myocardial viability PET
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Kaul S. Myocardial contrast echocardiography: basic principles [J]. Prog Cardiovasc Dis,2001,44( 1): 1-11.
  • 2Shimoni S, FrangogiannisNG, Aggeli C J, et al. Identification of hibernatingmyo cardium with quantitative intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiograph comparison with dobutamine echocardiography and thallium2201 scintigraphy[J]. Circulation,2003,107(4):538-544.
  • 3Mayer S, Grayburn PA. Myocardial contrast agents: recent advances and future directions[J]. Prog Cardiovasc Dis,2001,44(1):33-44.
  • 4Vom Dahl J, Herman WH, Hicks R J, et al. Myocardial glucose uptake in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus assessed quantitatively by dynamic positron emission tomography [J]. Circulation, 1993,88(2):395-404.
  • 5Bonow RO, Dilsizian V, Cuocolo A, et al.Identification of viable myocardium in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Comparison of thallium scintigraphy with reinjection and PET imaging with 18F-fiuorodeoxyglucose[J].Circulation, 1991,83(1):26-37.
  • 6陈在嘉,高润霖.冠心病[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:358-359.
  • 7Sbano JC, Tsutsui JM, Andrade JL, et al. Detection of functional recovery using low-dose dobutamine and myocardial contrast echocardiography after acute myocardial infarction treated with successful thrombolytic therapy[J]. Echocardiography,2005,22(6):496-502.
  • 8Huang WC, Chiou KR, Liu CP, et al. Comparison of real-time Contrast echocardiography and low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting the left ventricular functional recovery in patients after acute myocardial infarction under different therapeutic intervention[J]. Int J Cardiol,2005,104(1):81-91.
  • 9Tong KL, Kaul S,Wang XQ, et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography versus thrombolysis in myocardial infarction score in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and nondiag- nostic electrocardiogram[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2005,46(5):920-927.
  • 10Tsutsui JM,ElhendyA, Anderson JR, et al. Prognostic value of dobutamine stress myocardial contrast perfusion echocardiography [J]. Circulation,2005,112(10): 1444-1450.

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部