期刊文献+

小剂量来氟米特治疗类风湿关节炎的长期疗效观察 被引量:5

Efficiency of Low-Dose Leflunomide in Treating Active Rheumatoid Arthritis:An Eighteen-Month Trial
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察小剂量来氟米特治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的长期临床疗效。方法将28例RA患者随机分为治疗组(13例)和对照组(12例)。治疗组采用小剂量来氟米特治疗(略去负荷剂量,10 mg/d维持),对照组使用柳氮磺胺吡啶治疗,1.5~2.0 g/d。观察期18个月,观察指标:主要疗效指标为肿胀关节数、压痛关节数、患者及医师对疾病状况总体评价;次要疗效指标为疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、晨僵时间、健康评价问卷(HAQ)、C反应蛋白(CRP)水平;同时记录美国风湿病学会疗效评价指标(ACR20、ACR50)。结果治疗18个月后,治疗组患者主要疗效指标——肿胀关节数、医师及患者总体评价改善方面均优于对照组(P<0.05);且次要疗效指标——VAS、晨僵时间、HAQ评分改善方面亦优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。达到ACR20标准的病例,治疗组占76.9%,对照组为75.0%,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);达到ACR50标准的病例,治疗组和对照组分别为61.5%和41.7%,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗过程中,治疗组胃肠道反应轻微,有2例出现血压升高,2例出现肝酶升高,2例退出;对照组有1例退出。结论长期小剂量来氟米特治疗活动性RA,与柳氮磺胺吡啶相比疗效确切,患者耐受性好。 Objective To determine the long term clinical efficiency of low-dose leflunomide in treating rheumatoid arthritis.Methods Twenty-eight patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were randomly divided into therapy group(thirteen),which was administered low dose leflunomide(omitting loading dose,maintenance dose 10 mg/day) and control group(twelve),which was administered sulphasalazine(1.5~2.0 g/d).The treatment lasted for eighteen months.The indexes observed:the primary end-points including the numbers of tender and swollen joints and general assessments of physicians and patients,secondary end-points including VAS,morning stiffness,HAQ,CRP level and the efficiency evaluation indexes judged by the Institute of Rheumatology of the United States(ACR20 and ACR50).Results After eighteen months′ treatment,all the primary end-points in the therapy group got better improvements than that in the control group(P0.05).In addition,all the secondary end-points in the therapy group also got better improvements than that in the control group(P0.05).76.9% of the cases in the therapy group and 75.0% in the control group reached the standard of ACR20,and the difference was not significant(P0.05).61.5% of the cases in the therapy group and 41.7% of the cases in the control group reached the standard of ACR50,and the difference was significant(P0.05).In the process of treatment,the patients in the therapy had slight gastrointestinal discomfort,two cases′ blood pressure began to rise,two cases′ liver enzymes began to rise and two cases dropped out;there was only one cases in the control group dropped out.Conclusion Comparing with sulphasalazine,long term of low-dose leflunomide in treating active RA can bring about sure curative effect and the patients can have good endurance of medicine.
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期538-540,共3页 Chinese General Practice
基金 广西卫生厅自筹经费课题(Z2010135)
关键词 关节炎 类风湿 来氟米特 小剂量 治疗结果 Arthritis rheumatoid Leflunomide Low-dose Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Jakez-Ocampo J,Richaud-Patin Y,Simón JA,et al.Weekly dose of leflunomide for the treatment of refractory rheumatoid arthritis:an open pilot comparative study[J].Joint Bone Spine,2002,69(4):307-311.
  • 2Singer O,Gibofsky A.Methotrexate versus leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis:what is new in 2011?[J].Current Opinion in Rheumatology,2011,23(3):288-292.
  • 3Finckh A,Dehler S,Gabay C,et al.The effectiveness of leflunomide as a co-therapy of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis:a population-based study[J].Ann Rheum Dis,2009,68(1):33-39.
  • 4Poor G,Strand V.Efficacy and safety of leflunomide 10mg versus 20mg once dialy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis:multinational,double-blind,randomized trial[J].Rheumatology,2004,43(7):744-749.
  • 5Strangfeld A,Hierse F,Kekow J,et al.Comparative effectiveness of tumour necrosis factor a inhibitors in combination with either methotrexate or leflunomide[J].Ann Rheum Dis,2009,68(12):1856-1862.
  • 6王军,祖比亚,杨俊生,覃学勇,尹琦,廖明.小剂量来氟米特治疗类风湿关节炎的临床研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2011,11(6):1145-1148. 被引量:11
  • 7Curtis JR,Beukelman T,Onotrei A,et al.Elevated liver enzyme tests among patients with rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis treated with methotrexate and/or leflunomide[J].Ann Rheum Dis,2010,69(1):43-47.
  • 8Arnett FC,Edworthy SM,Bloch DA,et al.The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis[J].Arthritis Rheum,1988,31(3):315-324.
  • 9Nicolae L.Leflunomide use in renal transplantation[J].Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation,2009,14(4):370-374.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American RheumatismAssociation1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoidarthritis[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1988, 31 (3):315-324.
  • 2Strangfeld A, Hierse F, Kekow J, et al. Comparative effectiveness oftumour necrosis factor a inhibitors in combination with eithermethotrexate or leflunomide [J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2009, 68 (12):1856-1862.
  • 3Finekh A, Dehler S, Gabay C on behalf of the SCQM doctors. Theeffectiveness of leflunomide as a co-therapy of tumour necrosis factorinhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based study [J]. AnnRheum Dis, 2009,68(l):33-39.
  • 4Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers Met al. The American College ofRheumatology preliminary definintion of improvement in rheumatoidarthritis clinical trial[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1995, 38(6):724-735.
  • 5Van EA, Laan RFJM, Blom HJ, et al. Methotrexate in rheumatoidarthritis: an update with focus on mechanisms involved in toxicity[J].Semin Arthritis Rheum, 1998, 27(3):277-292.
  • 6Leca Nicolae. Leflunomide use in renal transplantation [J]. Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation, 2009, 14(4):370-374.
  • 7Maddison P, Kiely P, Kirkham B, et al. Lefltmomide in rheumatoid arthritis: recommendations through a process of consensus [J]. Rheumatology, 2005, 44(3):280-286.
  • 8Juan Jakez-Ocampo, Yvonne Richaud-Patin,J. Abraham SimO n andLuis Llorente. Weekly dose of leflunomide for the treatment of refrac-tory rheumatoid arthritis: an open pilot comparative study [J]. Jointbone spine, 2002; 69(4):307-311.
  • 9Jorge JH, Manuel RR, Rodrigo SO, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis treatmentwith weekly leflunomide: an open-label study. J Rheumatol, 2004, 31(2): 235-237.
  • 10Poor G, Strand V. Efficacy and safety of leflunomide lOmg versus20mg once dialy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: multina-tional, double-blind, randomized trial[J]. Rheumatology, 2004, 43(7):744-749.

共引文献10

同被引文献74

  • 1Saag KG, Teng GG, Patkar NM, et al. American College of Rheuma- tology 2008 recommendations for the use of nonbiologic and biologic dis- ease- modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis [ J ]. Ar- thritis Rheum, 2008, 59 (6): 762-784.
  • 2van den Bemt BJ, Zwikker HE, van den Ende CH. Medication adher- ence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a critical appraisal of the ex- isting literature [J]. Expert Rev Clin Immunol, 2012, 8 (4): 337 -351.
  • 3Hill J. Adherence with drug therapy in the rheumatic diseases Part two: measuring and improving adherence [ J]. Musculoskeletal Care, 2005, 3 (3): 143-156.
  • 4de Klerk E, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, et al. Patient compliance in rheumatoid arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, and gout [ J ]. J Rheumatol, 2003, 30 ( 1 ) : 44 - 54.
  • 5Beck NC, Parker JC, Frank RG, et al. Patients with rheumatoid ar- thrifts at high risk for noncompliance with salicylate treatment regimens [J]. J Rheumatol, 1988, 15 (7): 1081-1084.
  • 6de Klerk E, van der Heijde D, van der Tempel H, et al. Development of a questionnaire to investigate patient compliance with antirheumatic drug therapy [J]. J Rheumatol, 1999, 26 (12): 2635-2641.
  • 7de Klerk E, van der Heijde D, Landew6 R, et al. The compliance - questionnaire - rheumatology compared with electronic medication event monitoring: a validation study [J]. J Rheumatol, 2003, 30 ( 11 ) : 2469 - 2475.
  • 8Amett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheuma- tism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1988, 31 (3): 315-324.
  • 9Wetzels GE, Nelemans PJ, Schouten JS, et al. All that glisters is not gold : a comparison of electronic monitoring versus filled prescriptions - an observational study [ J ]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2006, 6 ( 1 ) : 8.
  • 10Grymonpre RE, Didur CD, Montgomery PR, et al. Pill count, self -report, and pharmacy claims data to measure medication adherence in the elderly [J]. Ann Pharmacother, 1998, 32 (7/8): 749- 754.

引证文献5

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部