期刊文献+

10CrNi3MoV钢不同焊缝韧度的低匹配接头安全评定

Safety assessment for under-matched joints of 10CrNi3MoV steel with different values of weld toughness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于欧洲工业结构完整性评定方法(SINTAP)提供的失效评定图FAD分析手段,针对不同焊缝韧度值条件下的10CrNi3MoV高强度船体钢低强匹配接头,建立了二级失效评定曲线.根据母材与焊缝的拉伸试验及CTOD试验结果,对比分析了同为低强匹配、接头韧度不同的2组接头安全评定结果.结果表明,选定评定级别之后,2组接头对应的FAD图形状变化很小;接头韧度值的大小对接头抵抗塑性失稳的性能影响微弱,但是显著影响接头抗脆断能力;同为低强匹配接头,焊缝韧度越高,评定点落于FAD图失效评定曲线内部的几率越大,接头安全性越好. With the application of failure assessment diagram(FAD) approach provided by 'structural integrity assessment procedure for european industry'(SINTAP),Class II failure assessment curves were set up for two under-matched joints of 10CrNi3MoV steel with different weld toughness.Based on the tensile test and CTOD test,safety assessment for the two joints was carried out.It showed that after the assessment level being selected,FAD shape changed very little.The results indicated that weld toughness was weakly influenced on the joint's resistance to plastic instability,but it can significantly influence on the anti-brittle capacity.The higher weld toughness is,the more likely assessment point locates within failure assessment curve,i.e.the joint's safety performance is better.
出处 《焊接学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期69-72,116,共4页 Transactions of The China Welding Institution
关键词 结构完整性 低匹配接头 韧度 安全评定 structural integrity under-matched joint toughness safety assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1川畑友弥,堺埆英男,大西一志,等.高張力鋼継手の耐脆性破壊特性に及ぼす溶接継手軟質化の影響[C]∥溶接学会论文集,2010:296-304.
  • 2Yun-Jae Kim,Robert A Ainsworth,Uwe Zerbst,et al.SINTAPdefect assessment procedure for strength mis-matched structures[J].Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2000,67:529-546.
  • 3矢岛浩.船体构造的断裂控制管理[C]∥北京:中国造船工程学会船舶结构疲劳与断裂学组,1982:26-27.
  • 4Bannister A C,Ruiz Ocejo J,Gutierrez-Solana F.Implications ofthe yield stress/tensile stress ratio to the SINTAP failure assess-ment diagrams for homogeneous materials[J].Engineering Frac-ture Mechanics,2000,67,547-562.
  • 5邓彩艳,张玉凤,霍立兴.基于SINTAP标准的海底外输管线安全评定[J].焊接,2005(9):17-20. 被引量:3

二级参考文献6

  • 1Stephen Webster, Adam Bannister. Structural integrity assessment procedure for Europe of the SIMAP programme overview. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2000, 67(6): 481 ~ 514.
  • 2Zerbst U, Hamann R, Wohlschlegel A. Application of the European flaw assessment procedure SINTAP to pipes. The International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2000,77( 11 ): 697 ~ 702.
  • 3Ainsworth R A, Gutierrez- Solana F, Ruiz Ocejo J. Analysis levels within the SINTAP defect assessment procedures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2000,67(6): 515 ~ 527.
  • 4BS7448: Part 4:1997 Method for determination of fracture resistance curves and initiation values for stable crack extension in metallic materials..
  • 5BS7448: Part 2:1997 Method for determination of KIC, critical CTOD and critical J values of welds in metallic materials..
  • 6Stacey A, Barthelemy J- Y, Leggatt R H. Incorporation of residual stresses into the SINTAP defect assessment procedure. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2000, 67(6): 573 ~ 611.

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部