期刊文献+

人工腰椎间盘置换治疗退行性腰椎间盘疾病16例分析 被引量:4

Preliminary clinical results of artificial disc replacement for degenerative disc disease in 16 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:与传统的单纯腰椎间盘切除和脊柱融合治疗方法相比,人工腰椎间盘置换具有明显的理论优势,已成为治疗退行性腰椎间盘疾病的最有希望的方法。目的:总结人工腰椎间盘置换治疗退行性腰椎间盘疾病的初步临床疗效。方法:2007-05/2010-10行人工腰椎间盘置换治疗退行性腰椎间盘疾病16例,其中男9例,女7例,平均年龄40.5岁(28~55岁)。结果与结论:随访时间6~36个月,置换后目测类比评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数、椎间隙高度均较置换前有显著改善(P〈0.01)。置换后腰椎活动度获有效维持,置换后腰椎活动度与置换前比较差异无显著性意义(P〉0.05)。结果显示人工腰椎间盘置换治疗退行性腰椎间盘疾病的初步临床结果令人满意,但其远期效果尚待进一步观察。 BACKGROUND: Simple discectomy and spinal fusion surgery were the classical methods for the degenerative disc disease. Comparing to them, artificial disc replacement (ADR) showed more theoretical superiority. OBJECTIVE: To present the preliminary clinical results of ADR for the treatment of degenerative disc disease. METHODS: From May 2007 to October 2010, ADR were preformed on 16 cases for the treatment of degenerative disc disease. 9 males and 7 females with average age of 40.5 years underwent ADR. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The follow-up time averaged 21.5 months (6-36 months). Postoperative visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index and intervertebral height were significantly improved as compared with those in preoperation (P 0.01). The postoperative range of motion (ROM) of the involved lumbar segment was effectively kept. The ROM before and after operation showed no significant difference (P 0.05). ADR can acquire satisfactory preliminary clinical results for the treatment of degenerative disc disease. However, further research is needed to study its long-term impact.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 2012年第4期638-641,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
基金 常州市卫生局青年人才项目(QN200805)~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1McCormick PC.Lumbar disc arthroplasty compared with interbody fusion.J Neurosurg Spine.2008;8(1):3-5.
  • 2Sinigaglia R,Bundy A,Costantini S,et al.Comparison of single-level L4-L5 versus L5-S1 lumbar disc replacement:results and prognostic factors.Eur Spine J.2009;18 Suppl 1:52-63.
  • 3庄超,王黎明,王刚锐,徐燕.人工髓核置换治疗腰椎间盘突出症后近期效果:与传统腰椎间盘切除加脊柱融合术比较[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2008,12(4):606-610. 被引量:5
  • 4侯铁胜,王惠聪.椎间盘切除对腰椎应力分布影响的实验研究[J].中华骨科杂志,1990,10(5):363-367. 被引量:13
  • 5Panjabi M,Malcolmson G,Teng E,et al.Hybrid testing of lumbar CHARITE discs versus fusions.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2007;32(9):959-966.
  • 6Ghiselli G,Wang JC,Bhatia NN,et al.Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2004; 86-A(7):1497-1503.
  • 7Gillet P.The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion.J Spinal Disord Tech.2003;16(4):338-345.
  • 8Freeman BJ,Davenport J.Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine:a systematic review of the literature.Eur Spine J.2006; 15(Suppl 3):439-447.
  • 9Geisler FH,Guyer RD,Blumenthal SL,et al.Effect of previous surgery on clinical outcome following 1-level lumbar arthroplasty.J Neurosurg Spine.2008;8(2):108-114.
  • 10廖翔,高志增,黄山虎,杨述华.双节段人工腰椎间盘置换术的疗效与探讨[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(19):1460-1462. 被引量:4

二级参考文献89

  • 1白玉树,石志才,毛宁方,栗景峰,张晔,章筛林,李明.同时应用融合和非融合技术治疗创伤性腰椎间盘损伤(附4例临床病例报道及文献复习)[J].脊柱外科杂志,2007,5(3):149-152. 被引量:3
  • 2Gillet P. The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003, 16:338-345,
  • 3Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004, 86 : 1497-1503.
  • 4Geisler FH. Surgical technique of lumbar artificial disc replacement with the Charite artificial disc. Neurosurgery, 2005, 56( 1 Suppl) :46-57.
  • 5Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty : an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine,2003, 28 Suppl : S110-117.
  • 6Blumenthal SL, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part Ⅰ: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine, 2005, 30: 1565-1575.
  • 7Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, et al. Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc Ⅱ after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003, 16:362- 368.
  • 8David T. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine, 2007, 32:661-666.
  • 9Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Ali el-H, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech,2005, 18:353-359.
  • 10Christoph J, Michael M, Karsten W, et al. Clinical Results of Total Lumbar Disc Replacement With ProDisc Ⅱ. Spine, 2006, 31 : 1923-1932.

共引文献41

同被引文献64

  • 1刘尚礼,黄东生,梁安靖,叶伟,李春海,马若凡.人工腰椎间盘置换对维持腰椎活动度和椎间隙高度的作用[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(1):41-44. 被引量:15
  • 2苏庆军,王庆一,康南,张岑山,曲铁兵,王志为.人工腰椎间盘置换术的并发症及其防治[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15(6):326-329. 被引量:10
  • 3Nunley PD,Jawahar A,Cavanaugh DA. Symptomatic adjacent segment disease after cervical total disc replacement:re-examining the clinical and radiological evidence with established criteria[J].{H}SPINE JOURNAL,2013,(01):5-12.
  • 4Berg S,Tropp HT,Leivseth G. Disc height and motion patterns in the lumbar spine in patients operated with total discreplacement or fusion for discogenic back pain.Results from a randomized controlled trial[J].{H}SPINE JOURNAL,2011,(11):991-998.
  • 5Zhong ZC,Hung C,Lin HM. The influence of different magnitudes and methods of applying preload on fusion and discreplacement constructs in the lumbar spine:a finite element analysis[J].Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin,2013,(09):943-953.
  • 6赵定麟.现代脊柱外科学[M].上海:世界图书出版公司,2006.223-224.
  • 7Hellum C, Berg L, Gjertsen φ, et al. Adjacent level degenera- tion and facet arthropathy after disc prosthesis surgery or rehabili- tation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc: second report of a randomized study [ J ]. Spine (Phila Pa1976), 2012,37(25): 2063-2073.
  • 8McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, et al. A prospective, randomized, muhicenter Food and Drug Administration investiga- tional device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part Ⅱ: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes [ J ]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976 ), 2005, 30 ( 14 ) : 1576-1583.
  • 9Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, et al. A prospective, ran- domized, multieenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHAR1TE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes [ J ~. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2005, 30 ( 14 ) : 1565-1575.
  • 10Quraishi NA, Konig M, Booker S J, et al. Access related compli- cations in anterior lumbar surgery performed by spinal surgeons [ J]. Eur Spine J, 2013, 22 ( Suppl 1 ) : S16-20.

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部