期刊文献+

具有委转功能的对比语用标记研究 被引量:8

A Study of Euphemistic Contrastive Pragmatic Markers
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文详细阐述了委转类对比标记所具有的语义功能,分析其在不同语体中的具体运用,从认知语用学等角度阐释了委转类对比标记的内在机理,并根据Traugott的(交互)主观化斜坡假说提出委转类标记有一个由低主观到主观再到交互主观的历时发展过程。 This paper first details the semantic function of the euphemistic contrastive pragmatic markers, then tries to analyze the application of the semantic functions in different styles and interpret the inherent mechanism of euphemistic contrastive pragmatic markers from several perspectives as cognitive pragmaties. In the end, with Traugott' s hypothesis of inter-subjectivization, the author proposes the theory that euphemistic contrastive pragmatic markers have a development process from objectivity to subjectivity then to intersubjectivity.
作者 袁伟 冯晓晴
出处 《语言教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期81-88,共8页 Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies
基金 徐州师范大学人文社会科学基金“口语标记的半机构特征研究”(编号:09SW1321)资助
关键词 委转功能 对比语用标记 话语标记 交互主观 euphemistic function contrastive pragmatic markers discourse marker intersubjectivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1冯光武.汉语语用标记语的语义、语用分析[J].现代外语,2004,27(1):24-31. 被引量:141
  • 2王敏,杨坤.交互主观性及其在话语中的体现[J].外语学刊,2010(1):48-51. 被引量:36
  • 3Blakemore, D. 1987 Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • 4Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. 1957 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge Universi- ty Press.
  • 5Fraser, B. 1998 Contrastive discourse markers in English. In: Jucker, Andreas H. , Ziv, Yael (Eds.), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. John Benjamins,301 -326.
  • 6Fraser, B. 1999 What are discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 31,931 -952.
  • 7Koike, Dale A. & Vann, Robert E. & Busquets, Joan 2001 Spanish no: reactive moves to perceived face-threaten- ing acts, Part II. Journal of Pragmatics 33,879 -899.
  • 8Langacker, Ronald W. 2007 Ten Lectures on Cognitive Grammar, Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Re- search Press.
  • 9Schiffrin, D. 1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Schourup, Lawrence 1999 Discourse markers. Lingua 107,227 -265.

二级参考文献30

  • 1沈家煊.语言的“主观性”和“主观化”[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(4):268-275. 被引量:2303
  • 2周一农.词汇的文化内涵[M].上海:上海三联书店,2005.
  • 3Benveniste, E. Subjectivity in language [ A ]. In Emile Ben-veniste( ed. ). Problems in General Linguistics[ C]. Coral Gables: FL: University of Miami Press, 1971/1958.
  • 4Comillie, B. Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Spanish ( Semi- ) Auxiliaries : A Functional-pragmatic and Cognitive-linguistic Account [ Z ]. PhD. Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2004.
  • 5Schiffrin, D. The Principle of Intersubjectivity in Communication and Conversation[J]. Semiotica, 1990 (1).
  • 6Finegan, E. Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: An Introduction [A]. In D. Stein and S. Wright (eds.). Subjectivity and Subjectivisation [ C ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  • 7Nuyts, J. Epistemic Modality, Language and Conceptualization [ M ]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001.
  • 8Nuyts, J. Modality: Overview and Linguistic Issues [ A ]. In W. Frawley ( ed. ). The Expression of Modality [ C ]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005.
  • 9Trangott, E. C. and Dasher, R. B. Regularity in Semantic Change[ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • 10Traugott, E. C. From Subjectification to Intersubjectification [ A]. In R. Hickey( ed. ). Motives for Language Change [ C ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2003.

共引文献175

同被引文献162

引证文献8

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部