期刊文献+

终末期肝病模型动态评分评估HBV相关肝衰竭预后的价值 被引量:4

Value of delta model for end-stage liver disease in evaluating the prognosis of liver failure patients with hepatitis B virus
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分及其变化率(△MELD)在预测HBV相关肝衰竭患者预后的价值。方法采用前瞻性研究,选取HBV相关肝衰竭患者98例,随访24周,收集相关临床资料,计算MELD、△MELD分值。比较不同时间点存活与死亡患者MELD及△MELD分值,应用ROC曲线下面积比较MELD及△MELD预测预后的准确性,以最佳临界值分组,比较不同组别不同时间点的病死率;绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线,运用生存分析方法比较各组生存率变化。结果98例患者24周内死亡52例,存活46例,死亡组与存活组间MELD、△MELD分值的差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);MELDI〉23组8、12、24周病死率均明显高于MELD〈23组,△MELD〉4.5组病死率也高于△MELD〈4.5组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.001);判断患者12、24周预后△MELD的AUC(0.823、0.815)明显大于MELD的AUC(0.680、0.684)(P〈0.05);生存分析显示以最佳临界值分组,各组间累积存活率的差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。结论终末期肝病模型评分系统适用于我国HBV相关肝衰竭患者预后的预测;△MELD评估预后的准确性要高于初始MELD,有着重要的临床应用价值。 Objective To evaluate the prognostic value of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and △MELD in liver failure patients infected with hepatitis B virus. Methods Based on prospective study design,98 hospitalized cases were studied and followed up for 24 weeks. The clinical data were recorded. We calculated the score of MELD and △MELD, and also compare the score between the survival group and death group. Using ROC curve plotting obtained the better decisive threshold. The case fatality rate were compared at different time points which the patients were classified by the best critical value of MELD and △MELD. We draw the Kaplan-Meier survival curve of different group and analyse the change of survival rate by log-rank analysis. Results 52 of 97 patients died and 46 survive during 24 weeks of followup. There was significant difference between the two groups for MELD and △MELD ( P 〈 0. 01 ). The case fatality rate in group which MELD t〉 23 was obviously higher than in that MELD 〈 23. The rate in group which △MELD 〉 4.5 was obviously higher than in that △MELD 〈 4.5 ( P 〈 0. 001 ). The area under curve (AUC) for the twelfth and 24th week' s prognosis judgment of △MELD (0. 823,0. 815 ) was larger than that of MELD ( 0. 680, 0. 684) ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Survival analyses (Kaplan-Meier) indicated that there were significant differences in cumulative survival rates among the groups which were grouped by optimization critical value (P = O. 000). Conclusions The scoring system of MELD also applied to the forecasting of prognosis for severe hepatitis B patients in China. The accuracy of △MELD to predict the prognosis was higher than that of MELD. The combination of MELD and △MELD showed good clinical practical value.
出处 《中华实验和临床病毒学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2012年第1期48-50,共3页 Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology
关键词 肝功能衰竭 预后 终末期肝病模型 Liver failure Prognosis Model for End-stage Liver Disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Schmid LE,Larsen FS. MELD score as a predictor of liver failure and death in patients with acetaminophen-induced liver injury. Hepatology, 2007,45 : 789 -796.
  • 2Yantorno SE, Kremers WK, Ruf AE, et al. MELD is superior to King's college and Clichy's criteria to assess prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure. Liver Transp1,2007,13:822-828.
  • 3Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2001, 33:464-470.
  • 4马慧,王豪,孙焱,郭芳,房继莲,邵杰,饶慧瑛,王剑,魏来.失代偿期肝硬化患者的终末期肝病模型预后分析[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2005,13(6):407-409. 被引量:43
  • 5Sammy S, Carmen L, Ayman BI, et al. The MELD score in advanced liver disease : association with clinical portal hypertension and mortality. J Exp Clin Trans plant, 2006,4: 395 -399.
  • 6Kamath PS, Kim WR. Is the change in MELD score a better indicator of mortality than baseline MELD score? Liver Transpl, 2003,9 : 19-21.
  • 7别彩群,杨冬华,汤绍辉,黄卫.终末期肝病模型变化率在失代偿期肝硬化患者预后分析中的价值[J].世界华人消化杂志,2007,15(29):3135-3139. 被引量:7

二级参考文献19

  • 1别彩群,杨冬华,汤绍辉,黄卫.终末期肝病模型评分差值对失代偿期肝硬化预后的分析[J].中华消化杂志,2007,27(6):368-370. 被引量:6
  • 2Forman LM, Lucey MR. Predicting the prognosis of chronic liver disease: an evolution from child to MELD. Mayo End-stage Liver Disease. Hepatology, 2001, 33: 473-475.
  • 3Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology, 2001,33: 464-470.
  • 4夏德全 王吉耀 见:陈灏珠 主编.肝硬化[A].见:陈灏珠,主编.实用内科学.第10版[C].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.16731689.
  • 5Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, et al. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology, 2000, 31: 864-871.
  • 6Wiesner RH, McDiarmid SV, Kamath PS, et al. MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation. Liver Transpl, 2001, 7: 567-580.
  • 7Malinchoc M,Kamath PS,Gordon FD,Peine CJ,Rank J,ter Borg PC.A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosysternic shunts.Hepatology 2000;31:864-871.
  • 8Kamath PS,Wiesner RH,Malinchoc M,Kremers W,Therneau TM,Kosberg CL,D'Arnico G,Dickson ER,Kim WR.A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.Hepatology 2001;33:464-470.
  • 9Freeman RB Jr,Wiesner RH,Harper A,McDiarmid SV,Lake J,Edwards E,Merion R,Wolfe R,Turcotte J,Teperman L.The new liver allocation system:moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy.Liver Transpl 2002;8:851-858.
  • 10Schepke M,Roth F,Fimmers R,Brensing KA,Sudhop T,Schild HH,Sauerbruch T.Comparison of MELD,Child-Pugh,and Emory model for the prediction of survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting.Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1167-1174.

共引文献48

同被引文献43

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部