期刊文献+

社会身份复杂性的研究:理论、方法与进展 被引量:23

Social Identity Complexity: Theories, Methods and Advances
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近十年来,"社会身份复杂性"这个概念逐渐引起社会心理学研究者的关注。社会身份复杂性是指个体对多重内群体身份之间的关系进行主观表征的方式,反映了个体对自己的多重内群体身份之间感知到的重叠程度。当个体感知到的重叠程度较高时,他们的社会身份复杂性就较低;反之,当个体感知到的重叠程度较低时,他们的社会身份复杂性就较高。本文首先简要介绍了多重内群体身份表征模型,然后从社会身份复杂性的理论内容、测量方法、作用以及影响因素等方面对以往的相关研究进行了回顾。最后,指出未来的研究应侧重对社会身份复杂性理论和研究设计的进一步完善、问卷量表的效度验证,并加强研究结果的具体应用。 Social identity complexity is one recent focus of social psychology, which refers to the way in which individuals subjectively represent the relationships among their multiple ingroup memberships. Social identity complexity reflects the degree of overlap perceived to exist between groups of which a person is simultaneously a member. When the overlap of multiple ingroups is perceived to be high, social identity complexity is low. Conversely, when the overlap of multiple ingroups is perceived to be low, social identity complexity is high. After a brief introduction of multiple ingroups representation model, this article systematically reviewed the researches on the contents and methods of social identity complexity, as well as the antecedents and consequences of social identity complexity. Finally, future studies should strive to forward theory and research design, validity verification of scales and the application of results.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期433-442,共10页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助项目 国家社会科学基金项目(11CSH046)
关键词 社会身份复杂性 多重社会身份 重叠 内群体偏见 外群体容忍 social identity complexity multiple social identities overlap ingroup bias outgroup tolerance
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Al Ramiah,A.,Hewstone,M.,&Schmid,K.(2011).Social identity and intergroup conflict.Psychology Study,56(1),44–52.
  • 2Ashforth,B.E.,Harrison,S.H.,&Corley,K.G.(2008).Identification in organizations:An examination of four fundamental questions.Journal of Management,34(3),325–374.
  • 3Austin,A.(2010,March).The effects of social identity complexity and ingroup salience on group-based guilt and intended reparations.A senior honors thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with research distinction in psychology in the Undergraduate Colleges of the Ohio State University.
  • 4Benet-Martínez,V.,&Haritatos,J.(2005).Bicultural identity integration:Components and psychosocial antecedents.Journal of Personality,73(4),1015–1050.
  • 5Blader,S.(2007).Let’s not forget the“me”in“team”:Investigating the interface of individual and collective identity.In C.A.Bartel,S.Blader,&A.Wrezniewski(Eds.),Identity and the modern organization.Mahwah,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 6Bodenhausen,G.V.(2010).Diversity in the person,diversity in the group:Challenges of identity complexity for social perception and social interaction.European Journal of Social Psychology,40,1–16.
  • 7Brewer,M.B.(2000).Reducing prejudice through cross-categorization:Effects of multiple social identities.In S.Oskamp(Ed.),Claremont symposium on applied social psychology:Reducing prejudice and discrimination(pp.165–183).Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage.
  • 8Brewer,M.B.,&Pierce,K.P.(2005).Social identity complexity and outgroup tolerance.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,31(3),428–437.
  • 9Brook,A.T.,Garcia,J.,&Fleming,M.A.(2008).The effects of multiple identities on psychological well-being.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,34,1588–1600.
  • 10Chiu,C.Y.,&Cheng,S.Y.Y.(2007).Toward a social psychology of culture and globalization:Some social cognitive consequences of activating two cultures simultaneously.Social and Personality Psychology Compass,1,84–100.

同被引文献257

引证文献23

二级引证文献167

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部