期刊文献+

关系质量问卷中文自评版用于儿童师生关系研究的信效度 被引量:4

Reliability and validity of the Network of Relationship Inventory-Relationship Quality Version in Chinese teacher-student relationship
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的】考察关系质量问卷中文自评版用于儿童师生关系质量评估的信度和效度。【方法】采用分层整群抽样方法,从某小学及某中学中各抽取四个班共979名学生,回收有效问卷822份。随机抽取57人用于重测。【结果】关系质量问卷用于评估师生关系时的Cronbachα系数为0.84,重测信度为0.77。限定因子个数为2进行主成分分析解释变异量的39.86%。验证性因素分析的拟合指标χ2/df、RMSEA、GFI、AGFI、NNFI、CFI分别为3.42、0.09、0.78、0.74、0.89、0.90。【结论】关系质量问卷的信度、效度均良好,符号心理测量学要求,可用于今后国内的有关研究。 【Objective】To assess the reliability and validity of Chinese children version of Network of Relationship Inventory-Relationship Quality Version(NRI-RQV).【Method】The original English version was translated into Chinese and administered to 822 children for teacher-student relationship quality assessment.【Results】The Cronbach α was 0.84 and the test-retest reliability was 0.77.Limited number of factors to 2,PCA shows the percentage of variance explained 39.86%.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fit indexes:χ2/df,RMSEA,GFI,AGFI,NNFI,CFI were 3.42,0.09,0.78,0.74,0.89,0.90.【Conclusion】The NRI-RQV is found to have good psychometrics properties,and applicable to assess the quality of Chinese parent-child relationship.
出处 《中国儿童保健杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第3期221-223,227,共4页 Chinese Journal of Child Health Care
基金 教育部基金(10YJCXLX001) 山东省自然基金(ZR2009CM023) 山东大学创新基金(2009TS015)
关键词 心理测量学研究 师生关系 关系质量问卷 信度 效度 psychometrics studies teacher-student relationship relationship quality version reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献64

共引文献1576

同被引文献75

  • 1王天生,程致屏.状态——特质焦虑调查表(STAI)在我国体育运动中的修订[J].西安体育学院学报,1987,4(4):80-88. 被引量:23
  • 2田芳英,何仲,李改珍.慢性心力衰竭病人自我护理状况的调查[J].护理研究,2005,19(2):205-207. 被引量:35
  • 3张卫东.应对量表(COPE)测评维度结构研究[J].心理学报,2001,33(1):55-62. 被引量:45
  • 4李小妹.护理学导论[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:216.
  • 5陆再英,钟南山.内科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007.26.
  • 6Thorn T,Haase N,Rosamond W,et al. Heart disease and stroke stati- sticsV2006 update:a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee[J].Circulation,2006,113(6):85-151.
  • 7Riegel B,Lee CS,Diokson W,et al. An Update on the Self-care of Heart Failure Index[J]. J Cardiovasc Nurs,2009,24(6):485-497.
  • 8Polit DF,Beck CT. The content validity index:are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations[J]. Res Nurs Health, 2006,29 ( 5 ) : 489-497.
  • 9温忠麟.侯杰泰,马什赫伯特结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学杂志,2004,36(2):186-194.
  • 10Beeri A, Lev-Wiesel R. Social rejection by peers: A risk fa- ctor for psychological distress. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 2012, 17(4): 216-221.

引证文献4

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部