期刊文献+

LABSTAR 50全自动血液细菌培养仪性能评价

Functional evaluation of LABSTAR 50 blood-culturing device
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:介绍LABSTAR 50全自动血液细菌培养仪的结构特点,并评价其性能。方法:用LABSTAR 50全自动血培养仪与BACTEC 9120全自动血培养仪,对临床血液标本经确认已经培养出的菌株及标准菌株,用生理盐水制备成5cfu/ml和30cfu/ml的菌群,并分别上机进行检测,并对结果进行比较。结果:检测灵敏度总符合率为97.62%,接种量在10~30cfu/ml的菌群,LABSTAR 50与BACTEC 9120均能阳性报警,符合率为100%。接种量在1~5cfu/ml的菌群,符合率为95.24%。阳性报警检测时间总符合率为94.9%,在±2h以内阳性报警的标准瓶符合率为96.2%、成人瓶为96.2%、儿童瓶为92.6%。结论:LABSTAR 50全自动血液细菌培养仪阳性报警时间、检测灵敏度与BACTEC 9120相对照,无显著差异。LABSTAR 50全自动血液细菌培养仪在主要性能方面上达到了进口同类产品的技术指标,能够满足我国临床血液细菌培养对自动化快速培养的要求。 Objective: To introduce structure and feature of LABSTAR 50 blood-culturing device, and evaluate its function. Methods: Strains and standard strains which were recognized with clinical blood samples were prepared with saline, and the concentration was 5 cfu/ml and 30cfu/ml. Then they were tested on LABSTAR 50 blood-culturing device and BACTEC 9120 blood-culturing one. Results: The coincidence rate of the sensitivity was 97.62%. For thestrains with the inoculation volume of 10-30 cfu/ml's, the positive report was obtained by both devices. In 1-5 cfu/lnl inoculation, the coincidence rate was 95.24%. The total coincidence rate for positive alarm detection was 94.9%. In ±2 hours, it was 96.2%, 96.2% and 92.6% in the standard bottle, adult one and children one, respectively. Conclusion: There are no significant differences in different parameters between the LABSTAR 50 blood-culturing device and the BACTEC 9120 one. Therefore, the former one can be used in clinical practice in China.
出处 《中国医学装备》 2012年第2期70-72,共3页 China Medical Equipment
关键词 血液 细菌 培养仪 性能 Blood Bacterium Culturing device Function
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献23

  • 1刘恭植.血培养研究的进展[J].临床检验杂志,1996,14(1):48-50. 被引量:14
  • 2朱德全,季海生.BacT/Alert3D血培养分级报告的临床应用研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2006,16(8):955-957. 被引量:13
  • 3褚云卓,年华,邓宇欣,欧阳金鸣,王倩.血培养的菌谱调查及耐药性分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2007,17(4):472-474. 被引量:50
  • 4Nolte FS, Williams J M,Jerris RC, et al. Multicenter clinical evaluation of a continuous monitoring blood culture system using fluorescent sensor technology (BACTEC 9240)[J]. J Clin Microbiol,1993,31(3):552-557.
  • 5Marchandin H, Compan B, Buochberg MS, et al. Detection kinetics for positive blood culture byusing the VITAL automated system. J Clin Microbiol, 1995,33:2098-2100
  • 6WeinsteinMP, Mirrett S, Reimer LG, et al. Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard and FAN aerobic blood cultuer bottles for detcction of blood stream infection. J Clin Microbiol, 1995,33:978-980
  • 7周贵民,中华医学检验杂志,1996年,19卷,331页
  • 8娄永新,实用临床细菌学检验与进展,1992年,250页
  • 9Egidio FV,Emanuela V,Carlo A,et al.Use of simulated blood cultures for time to detection comparison between BacT/ALERTTM and BACTECTM 9240 blood culture syBtems.Diagn Micmbiol Infect Dis,2002,44:235-240.
  • 10Zieger R,Johnscher I,Martus P,et al.Controlled clinical laboratory compareison of two supplemented aerobic and anaerobic media used in automated blood culture systems to detect bloodstream infections.J Clin Microbiol,1998,36:657-661.

共引文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部