期刊文献+

T_1声门癌加大分割剂量放疗的随机对照研究

A randomized control trial of increased fraction-dose radiotherapy for patients with T_1 glottic carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过随机对照研究,分析比较每次分割剂量为2.3 Gy与常规分割2.0 Gy治疗T1声门癌的疗效及其毒副反应情况。方法 1995年1月至2005年12月我院首次接受单纯放射治疗的T1声门型喉鳞癌患者165例,男158例,女7例,抽烟患者占95.8%(158/165),随机分组研究,加大分割剂量组(LF组)83例,每次分割量2.3 Gy,原发灶靶区中心参考点剂量中位值为66.7 Gy(66.7~71.3 Gy),中位放疗时间为40 d(40~42 d);常规分割剂量组(CF组)82例,每次分割量2.0Gy,原发灶靶区中心参考点剂量中位值为70.0 Gy(70.0~74.0 Gy),中位放疗时间分别为49 d(49~51 d)。Kaplan-Meier法计算肿瘤专项生存率(CSSR)及肿瘤局部控制率(LCR),Log-rank法检验生存及肿瘤局部控制率差异,Cox比例风险模型进行多变量分析。结果 (1)LF组与CF组相比,5、10年肿瘤专项生存率分别为95.18%和95.12%、91.57%和91.46%,χ2=0.071,P=0.789,差异无显著性。(2)治疗结束后观察12周,LF与CF组的客观有效率均为100%,完全缓解率(CR)分别为100.0%(83/83)、97.6%(80/82)(χ2=0.518,P=0.471)。(3)LF组及CF组放疗后5年及10年局部控制率分别为95.18%和80.49%、92.77%和78.05%,差异具显著性(χ2=7.944,P=0.005)。(4)多变量分析结果显示,分割方式及前联合是否受侵是影响T1声门癌放疗长期局部控制率的预后因子,较大的放疗分割量与常规分割相比有较高的局部控制率(HR=0.35,95%CI=0.13~0.7,P=0.002),而前联合受侵局控率较低(HR=3.54,95%CI=1.74~8.32,P=0.01)。(5)LF组及CF组急性放疗副反应及远期并发症相仿。结论 (1)放疗治疗T1声门癌的5、10年肿瘤专项生存率很高,分别达95%及91%以上。(2)加大分割剂量及缩短放疗时间能显著提高5、10年的局控率,未见增加近期及远期毒副反应。(3)分割方式及前联合是否受侵影响T1声门癌放疗的局部控制率。 Objective To analyze and compare radiotherapy effects and its adverse reactions through a randomized control trial between fraction-dose 2.3 Gy and 2.0 Gy respectively.Methods 165 patients with T1 glottic squamous cell carcinoma treated in our hospital from January 1995 to December 2005 were randomized to Increased fraction-dose radiotherapy Group(LF Group) and Conventional fraction-dose Group(CF Group).Male/femal=22.6:1(158/7).Smokers accounted for 95.8%(158/165).Increased fraction-dose radiotherapy Group(LF Group) included 83 cases with fraction-dose 2.3 Gy,the median dose of reference point of primary tumor 66.7Gy(66.7~71.3 Gy) and median radiation time 40 days(40~42 days).The conventional fraction-dose group(CF Group) had 82 patients with fraction-dose 2.0 Gy,the median dose of reference point of primary tumor 70.9 Gy(70.0~74.0 Gy) and median radiation time 49 days(49~51 days).Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate cancer-specific survival rate(CSSR) and local control rate(LCR),Log-rank test to compare the difference of CSSR and LCR,and Cox's proportional hazards model for multivariate analysis.Results(1)To compare LF Group with CF Group,the 5 and 10 year cancer-specific survival rates(CSSR) were 95.18% vs 95.12% and 91.57% vs.91.46%,respectively,having no significant difference(χ2=0.071,P=0.789).(2)At 12 weeks from the end of radiotherapy,the objective effective rate was both 100% for LF and CF Group,and the complete remission rate(CR) was 100%(83/83) for LF Group and 97.6%(80/82) for CF Group(χ2=0.518,P=0.471).(3) The 5 and 10-year local control rates(LCR) of LF group were 95.18% and 92.77%,compared with that of CF Group,being 80.49% and 78.05%,respectively,reaching significant difference(χ2=7.944,P=0.005).(4)Multivariable analysis revealed that fraction size and whether anterior commissure was involved or not had influence on the long-term LCR of T1 glottic carcinoma who had received radiotherapy.Compared with conventional fraction-dose,larger fraction-dose resulted in higher LCR(HR=0.35,95%CI=0.13~0.7,P=0.002),while the invasion of anterior commissure got lower LCR(HR=3.54,95%CI=1.74~8.32,P=0.01).(5)There was no significant difference between LF and CF Group in both the incidences of radiation acute adverse reactions and long-term complications.Conclusions(1)The 5 and 10-year CSSR for T1 glottic carcinoma received radiotherapy were rather high,beyond 95% and 91% respectively.(2)Increased fraction-dose and shortened radiation time could significantly improve the 5 and 10-year LCR,having no increased the incidence of recent and long-term side effects.(3)The LCR of radiotherapy for T1glottic carcinoma could be influenced by the fraction size and whether anterior commissure was invaded or not.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2011年第5期390-394,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词 T1声门癌 放射治疗 分割剂量 放疗时间 T1 glottic carcinoma Radiotherapy Fraction-dose Radiation time
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1EV Sjogren,RG Wiggenraad,S Le Cessie,et al.Outcome of ra-diotherapy in T1 glottic carcinoma:a population-based study[J].Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol,2009,266(5):735-744.
  • 2Cellai E,Frata P,Magrini SM,et al.Radical radiotherapy forearly glottic cancer:Results in a series of 1087 patients from twoItalian radiation oncology centers.I.The case of T1N0 disease[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2005,63(5):1378-1386.
  • 3Mendenhall WM,Werning JW,Hinerman RW,et al.Manage-ment of T1-T2 glottic carcinomas[J].Cancer,2004,100(9):1786-1792.
  • 4Mendenhall WM,Parsons JT,Million RR,et al.T1-T2 squa-mous cell carcinoma of the glottic larynx treated with radiationtherapy:relationship of dose-fractionation factors to local controland complications[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1988,15(6):1267-1273.
  • 5Yamazaki H,Nishiyama K,Tanaka E,et al.Radiotherapy forearly glottic carcinoma(T1N0M0):results of prospective ran-domized study of radiation fraction size and overall treatment time[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,64(1):77-82.
  • 6Randall ME,Springer DJ,Raben M.T1-T2 carcinoma of theglottis:relative hypofractionation[J].Radiology,1991,179(2):569-571.
  • 7JC van der Voet,Keus RB,Hart AA,et al.The impact of treat-ment time and smoking on local control and complications in T1glottic cancer[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1998,42(2):247-255.
  • 8Rudoltz MS,Benammar A,Mohiuddin M.Prognostic factors forlocal control and survival in T1 squamous cell carcinoma of theglottis[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1993,26(5):767-772.
  • 9Nishimura Y,Nagata Y,Okajima K,et al.Radiation therapy forT1,2 glottic carcinoma:impact of overall treatment time on localcontrol[J].Radiother Oncol,1996,40(3):225-232.
  • 10Nomiya T,Nemoto K,Wada H,et al.Long-term results of ra-diotherapy for T1a and T1bN0M0 glottic carcinoma[J].Laryngo-scope,2008,118(8):1417-1421.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部