期刊文献+

“晕轮效应”对考录公务员面试考官的影响与应对 被引量:3

The Influence of "Halo Effect" on Civil Service Interviewer and How to Deal with It
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "晕轮效应"是一种主观心理臆测,是一个不可忽视、又无处不在的评价偏见,具有片面性、表面性和弥散性的特点。它存在于考官队伍中,对公务员的选拔工作会造成负面影响。"晕轮效应"作为一种心理现象,在公务员的面试过程中是不可消除的,因此,应该从主观上主动地去避免、克制,并且还要建立严格的选人用人制度,在客观上防止"晕轮效应"的出现,使"晕轮效应"的影响降到最低程度,保证面试的科学性和可靠性,努力做到公平、公开、公正地选拔人才,求得面试的效果最佳。 The "halo effect" is a subjective psychological speculation,should not be neglected,and everywhere in the evaluation of bias,one-sided,surface and diffuse features.It exists in the ranks of examiners,the selection of civil servants will have a negative impact."Halo effect" as a psychological phenomenon,the interview process in the civil service can not be eliminated,should take the initiative to avoid the subjective,restraint,and also to establish a strict system of selection and appointment,the objective to prevent the "halo effect" occurs,so that the "halo effect" to a minimum,ensure the scientific and reliability of the interview,to be fair, open and impartial selection of personnel,the interview obtained the best results.
作者 徐敏
机构地区 徐州市行政学院
出处 《行政与法》 2012年第2期10-14,共5页 Administration and Law
关键词 晕轮效应 面试考官 结构化面试 考录公务员面试 halo effect interviewer structured interview civil servants interview
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献23

  • 1[1]Dweck C S, Chiu Hong. Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reaction: a world from two perspectives, Psychological Inquiry, 1995, 6: 267~285
  • 2[2]Levy S R , Plaks J E, Dweck C S. Modes of social thought: Implicit theories and social understanding. In: Chaiken S, Trope Y, ed. Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology. NY: Guilford Press, 1999. 179~202
  • 3[3]Mueller C, Dweck C S. Praise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 75: 33~52
  • 4[4]Shoda Y, Michel W. Cognitive social approach to dispositional inferences: What if the perceiver is a cognitive social theorist? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1993, 19: 574~585
  • 5[5]Chiu Hong, Dweck C S. lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 73: 19~30
  • 6[6]Levy S R., Dweck C S. trait vs. process-centered social judgment. Social cognition, 1998, 16: 151~172
  • 7[7]Dweck C S. Self-theory: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Philadelphia, PA, US: Psychology Press, 1999
  • 8[8]Dweck C S, Chiu, Hong. Implicit theories: elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 1995, 6: 322 ~333
  • 9[9]Norenzayan A, Choi I, Nisbett R E. Eastern and Western perceptions of causality for social behavior: Lay theories about personalities and situations. In: Prentice D A, Miller D T ed. Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict. New York, NY, US: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999. 239~272
  • 10[10]Nisbett R E, Peng C I, Norenzayan A. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 2001, 108(2): 291~310

共引文献71

同被引文献11

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部