期刊文献+

集装箱航运系统协作模式对比研究 被引量:1

A Comparative Study on Different Cooperating Patterns of Container Shipping Systems
原文传递
导出
摘要 首先对不考虑直销市场的集装箱航运系统三种协作模式:集中式协作模式、信息对称下的分散式协作模式、信息不对称下的分散式模式进行了数学推导分析。研究发现,集中式模式下整体空箱规模比信息对称的分散式模式航运系统较小,而信息不对称的分散式模式和信息对称的分散式模式相比,优化问题难度陡增。然后,为了贴近现实,对考虑直销市场参与下的集装箱航运系统进行了系统动力学仿真研究。结果表明,在考虑直销市场参与的集装箱航运系统中,集中式协作模式下航运系统整体利润最大,分散式协作模式下航运系统整体利润下降较多,是由"双重边际性"的加剧所造成;信息不对称的分散模式航运系统整体利润略低于信息对称的分散模式航运系统整体利润,是由加入直销市场以后,信息失真现象的有效缓解所引起的。 There are three cooperating patterns between the carrier and the forwarder:the centralized shipping chain,the decentralized shipping chain under information symmetry,and the decentralized shipping chain under information asymmetry.In this paper,the shipping system without the spot market is firstly studied by mathematic deduction method.The results show that the total container quantity with the centralized shipping chain is fewer than that with the decentralized shipping chain under information symmetry.In order to close to reality,the spot market is considered in the shipping market,and the related system dynamic models are built by the system dynamic method.Several findings obtained by simulations are:(1) the information symmetry increases the volatility of the carrier's income and cost;(2) the system's profit decreases with the information sharing level;and(3) the spot market reduces the demand information asymmetric and increases the double-marginal effect of the shipping system.
出处 《工业工程与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期13-20,共8页 Industrial Engineering and Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目-香港研究资助局联合资助项目(70831160527) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70872077)
关键词 集装箱航运系统 直销市场 系统动力学 container shipping system the spot market system dynamics
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Li J A,Leung S C,Wu Y,et al.Allocation of empty containersbetween multi-ports[J].European Journal of OperationalResearch,2007,182:400-412.
  • 2Ang J S,Cao C,Ye H-Q.Model and algorithms for multi-period sea cargo mix problem[J].European Journal ofOperational Research,2007,180:1381-1393.
  • 3Francesco M D,Crainic T G,Zuddas P.The effect of multi-scenario policies on empty container repositioning[J].Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and TransportationReview,2009,45(5):758-770.
  • 4Ergun O,Kuyzu G,Savelsbergh M.Reducing truckloadtransportation costs through collaboration[J].TransportationScience,2007,41(2):206-221.
  • 5Krajewska M A,Kopfer H,Laporte G,et al.Horizontalcooperation of freight carriers:Request allocation and profitsharing[J].Journal of the Operational Research Society,2008,59:1483-1491.
  • 6Krajewska M A,Kopfer H.Transportation planning in freightforwarding companies-tabu search algorithm for the integratedoperational transport planning problem[J].European Journalof Operational Research,2009,197(2):741-751.
  • 7Midoro R,Pitto A.A Critical Evaluation of Strategic Alliancesin Liner Shipping[J].Maritime Policy and Management,2007,27:31-40.
  • 8Heaver T.The Evolving Roles of Shipping Lines inInternational Logistics[J].International Journal of MaritimeEconomics,2002,4:210-230.
  • 9Caplice C.Optimization-based procurement for transportationservices[J].Journal of Business Logistics,2003,24(2):109-128.
  • 10陈虎,韩玉启,王斌.基于系统动力学的库存管理研究[J].管理工程学报,2005,19(3):132-140. 被引量:27

二级参考文献29

共引文献34

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部