期刊文献+

加氢站氢气事故后果量化评价 被引量:8

Quantitative Assessment on Hydrogen Releases of Hydrogen Refueling Station by Consequence Modeling
下载PDF
导出
摘要 定量研究了加氢站内物理爆炸、闪火、射流火焰和气云爆炸四种典型氢气事故后果,考察储氢压力、泄漏孔径以及风速大小对事故后果的影响规律.研究结果表明:物理爆炸和气云爆炸的有害影响距离最大,可分别作为瞬时泄漏和连续泄漏的决定性后果;物理爆炸、闪火、气云爆炸和射流火焰的有害影响距离均随着储氢压力和泄漏孔径的增大而增大,但在各个方向上的增幅表现出不同的规律;在大风天气条件下,加氢站氢气泄漏事故可造成更为严重的危害. As a new energy infrastructure for public use, the hydrogen refueling station has been developing rapidly in recent years, but the safety issue has become one of the biggest obstacles to its further development. This paper investigates the influence of storage pressure, release diameter and wind velocity on the hydrogen consequences including physical explosion, flash fire, jet fire and vapor cloud explosion. The results show that physical explosion and vapor cloud explosion are the leading consequences for instantaneous release and continuous release, respectively. The harm effect distances of all hydrogen consequences increase with the growth of release pressure and release diameter, but present different characteristics in different directions. With greater wind velocity, the hydrogen releases can produce longer harm effect distances.
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期286-291,共6页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 国家"八六三"高技术研究发展计划(2011AA11A284 2009AA05Z118) 国家国际科技合作计划(2010DFA64080) 111引智计划(B08019)
关键词 加氢站 氢气泄漏 事故后果 量化评价 hydrogen refueling station hydrogen release consequence modeling quantitative assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Lisa Callaghan Jerram , Anissa Dehamna. 2009 Hydrogen infrastructure survey [ EB/OL ]. [ 2011-10-05 ] http://www. fuelcelltoday, corn/online/survey? survey = 2009-06/2009- Infrastructure-Survey-Free.
  • 2Matthijsen AJCM, Kooi E. S. Safety distances for hydrogen filling stations [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2006, 19: 719.
  • 3李志勇,潘相敏,谢佳,马建新.加氢站风险评价研究现状与进展[J].科技导报,2009,27(16):93-98. 被引量:18
  • 4IGC Doc 75/07/E/rev. Determination of safety distances[S]. [S. l.]:European Industrial Gases Association, 2007.
  • 5Witlox HWM, Holt A. A unified model for jet, heavy and passive dispersion including droplet rainout and re-evaporation [C]// International Conference and Workshop on Modeling the Consequences of Accidental Releases of Hazardous Materials, San Francisco, CCPS, 1999:315-344.
  • 6Baker WE, Kulesz, JJ, Richer RE, et al. Workbook for predicting pressure wave and fragment effects of exploding propellant tanks and gas storage vessels[R]. Washington: NASA Scientific and Technical Information Office, 1977.
  • 7CPPS. Guidelines for evaluating the characteristics of vapor cloud explosions, flash fires and Bleves [R]. [S. l. ]Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1994.
  • 8Chamberlain G A. Developments in design methods for predicting thermal radiation from flares [J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 1987, 65:299.
  • 9Johnson A D, Brightwell H M, Carsley A J. A model for predicting the thermal radiation hazard from large scale horizontally released natural gas jet fires[J]. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, 1994, 72: 157.
  • 10Baker QA, Tang MJ, Scheier E, et al. Vapor cloud explosion analysis [J]. Process Safety Progress, 1996, 15(2) : 106.

二级参考文献34

  • 1Norsk Hydro ASA, DNV. Methodology for rapid risk ranking for hydrogen refueling station concepts [R]. European Integrated Hydrogen Project Phase 2, 2002.
  • 2Nilsen S, Andersen H S, Hangom G P, et all. Risk assessments of hydrogen refueling station concepts based on onsite production [R]. European Integrated Hydrogen Project Phase 2, 2003.
  • 3Norsk Hydro ASA, DNV. Risk acceptance criteria for hydrogen refueling stations[R]. European Integrated Hydrogen Project Phase 2, 2003.
  • 4Jones N G L. A schematic design for a HAZOP study on a liquid hydrogen filling station [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1984, 9(1-2): 115-121.
  • 5Kikukawa S, Mitsuhashi H, Miyake A. Risk assessment for liquid hydrogen fueling stations [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(2): 1135-1141.
  • 6Rosyid O A, Jablonski D, Hauptmanns U. Risk analysis for the infrastructure of a hydrogen economy [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(15): 3194-3200.
  • 7European Industrial Gases Association. Determination of safety distance, IGC Doc 75/01/E/rev [S]. EIGA, 2001.
  • 8Marangona A, Carcassi M, Engebφ A, et al. Safety distances: Definition and values [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(13): 2192-2197.
  • 9International Code Council. International fire code [S]. ISBN 892395- 60-6, International Code Council, INC. 2002.
  • 10La Chance J, Tchouvelev A, Ohi J, et al. Risk-informed process and tools for permitting hydrogen fueling stations[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energg, 2009, 34(14): 5855-5861.

共引文献17

同被引文献74

  • 1余亚波,邓亚东.燃料电池客车高压舱氢气泄漏扩散[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2020,54(2):381-388. 被引量:9
  • 2李铮.空气冲击波作用下人的安全距离[J].爆炸与冲击,1990,10(2):135-144. 被引量:36
  • 3毛宗强.氢能知识系列讲座(1) 氢能:人类未来的清洁能源——由《百年备忘录》说开去[J].太阳能,2007(1):9-11. 被引量:5
  • 4毛宗强.氢能知识系列讲座(4) 将氢气输送给用户[J].太阳能,2007(4):18-20. 被引量:14
  • 5Ludwig-B61kow-Systemtechnik GmbH. Hydrogen filling stations worldwide [EB/OL]. 2014-06-16. http: // www. h2stations, org.
  • 6KIM E. PARK J, CHOJ H, et al. Simulation of hydro gen leak and explosion for the safety design of hydrogen fueling station in Korea [J]. International Journal of Hy- drogen Energy, 2013, 38 (3): 1737- 1743.
  • 7MIDDHA P, HANSEN O R, GROETHE M, et al. Hydrogen explosion study in a confined lube: FLACS CFD simulations and experiments [C]// Proceedings of the 21st International Colloquium of Dynamics of Explo- sions and Reactive Systems. Poitou: University of Poi[ iers, 2007.
  • 8PRANKUI. M. OLAV R H. Using computational fluid dynamics as a tool for hydrogen safety studies [J]. Jour- nal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 22(3) : 295 - 302.
  • 9LI Zhbyong. PAN Xiang-min. MA Jian-xin. Quantita tive risk assessment on 2010 Expo hydrogen station [J] International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36 ( 6 ) 4079 - 4086.
  • 10MOLKOV V. Fundamentals of hydrogen safety engineer- ing [M]. I.ondon: Ventus Publishing ApS, 2012.

引证文献8

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部