医疗纠纷中举证责任问题研究(一)

Allocation of the burden of proof in medical tangle

自2002年最高人民法院颁布实施司法解释《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》至今,医疗诉讼适用举证责任倒置引发的争议和对其负面影响的讨论从未间断。8年以后,过错及过错推定原则随着2009年12月26日《侵权责任法》的正式出台最终尘埃落定。本文从医疗纠纷中举证责任制度各阶段发展的角度,通过对比举证责任倒置和《侵权责任法》中关于医疗损害责任的多元化归责原则的探讨,理解新法中医疗纠纷举证责任分配的变化。

Since 2002,Supreme People＇s Court promulgated the judicial interpretation（＂the evidence on a number of Civil Procedure provides that＂）So far,medical litigation burden of proof applicable to the dispute and its negative impact on the discussions never stopped.8 years later,the principle of presumption of fault and the fault with the December 26,2009,＂Tort Liability Act,＂the official introduction of the final settled.This article from the burden of proof in medical dispute the perspective of the various stages of development,by comparing the burden of proof and ＂Tort Liability Act,＂health care liability for damage on the principles of diversity attributable to understand the new law distribution of the burden of proof in medical malpractice changes.