期刊文献+

基于可达性与服务度的城市避震减灾绿地规划布局研究——以遵化市为例 被引量:5

Study on Urban Green Space Planning for Earthquake Resistance and Hazardous Reduction Based on Accessibility and Service Rate——A Case Study of Zunhua City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统的避震减灾绿地指标包括总面积、人均面积等,这些指标只能应避震减灾绿地的量,而不能反应其质,更不能反应其在灾害发生及灾后救援中与灾民需求的关系,出现了避震减灾绿地方面的"不公平"现象。自"防灾避险实施率"提出以后,绿地的可达性分析与评价逐渐被重视。针对这些问题,本文从避震减灾绿地的可达性与服务度概念入手,提出基于可达性与服务度的避震减灾绿地布局规划的方法。并以遵化市为例,以可达性作为避震减灾绿地定位的依据,服务度作为避震减灾绿地规划定量的依据,给出了遵化市规划建成区的避震减灾绿规划布局方案。通过此方法以期对未来避震减灾绿地体系规划提供可借鉴理论及方法。 Traditional indicators of earthquake resistance and hazardous reduction include total area and per capita area.These indicators reflect the quantity but not quality.Relationship between disaster,rescue and victims' needs is ignored,leads to situation of unfairness.Since the proposal of Implementation Rate of Disaster Prevention,analysis and evaluation of accessibility are getting more attention.This paper discusses the concept of accessibility and service rate,concludes the method of green space planning for earthquake resistance and hazardous reduction based on accessibility and service rate.Zunhua City,as an example, accessibility,as the basis for orientation of green space for earthquake resistance and hazardous reduction, is evaluated.Service rate,as the basis for quantity of green space for earthquake resistance and hazardous reduction,is studied to generate the layout of green space for earthquake resistance and hazardous reduction.Further study of green space planning for earthquake resistance and hazardous reduction can be developed based on this method.
出处 《建筑与文化》 2012年第1期97-99,共3页 Architecture & Culture
基金 国家自然科学基金(编号:30972414 30972415) 江苏省六大人才高峰项目(城市避震减灾公园绿地体系规划与实践) 江苏省研究生教育创新工程项目(城市防灾避险绿地体系规划理论研究) 南京林业大学高学历人才基金项目(163120020)共同资助
关键词 风景园林 避震减灾 可达性 服务度 遵化市 Landscape Architecture Earthquake Resistance and Hazardous Reduction Accessibility Service Rate Zunhua City
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献29

  • 1李平华,陆玉麒.城市可达性研究的理论与方法评述[J].城市问题,2005(1):69-74. 被引量:132
  • 2裴玉龙,冯树民.基于交通冲突的行人过街危险度研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2007,39(2):285-287. 被引量:26
  • 3城市绿地分类标准(CJJ/T852002)[S].
  • 4McAllister, D.M., Equity and effi ciency in public facility location [J]. Geograph, 1976: 47-63.
  • 5Lucy, N.H., EQuity and planning for local services[J]. J. Am. Planning Assoc, 1981,(47): 447-451.
  • 6Hansen W G. How accessibility shapes land - use[J]. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1959,
  • 7Kwan M P, Murray A T. Recent Advances in Accessibility Research: Representation[J]. Methodology and Applications. Geographical Systems. 2003,(5): 129-138.
  • 8Bach, L., Locational Models for Systems of Private and Public Facilities Based on Concepts of Accessibility and Access Opportunity. Environ. Planning A , 1980,(12): 301-320.
  • 9ESRI. Cost Distance algorithm. ESRI ArcGIS Desktop 9.0 Online Help [CP/DK]. U.S.:ESRI Inc, 2004.
  • 10Perry, C.A., 1966.The Neighbor hood Unit Formula[M]. Urban Housing, The Free Press, New York.

共引文献472

同被引文献56

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部