期刊文献+

唯递归论的跨语言比较述评 被引量:14

A review and commentary on cross-language comparison of recursion-only claim
原文传递
导出
摘要 递归是语言机能的本质属性,语言中局部非递归成分不能改变语言递归的本质属性。语言物种特质必然要求生物演化解释,唯递归论极大促进了语言演化研究。本文在综述有关唯递归论的跨语言比较研究的基础上,指出人类处理自然语言时的存贮策略、计算策略和工作记忆等个体差异因素不构成语言递归的否定证据,语言生态多样性要求生物普遍性解释和演化充分性原则,语言演化研究不受目的论的干扰和束缚,并需满足新的方法要求。 Recursion is the fundamental property of language faculty.Some non-recursive language constructions cannot alter the recursive property of language.The species property of human language demands an evolutionary biological explanation.The recursion-only claim dramatically accelerates the research of language evolution.The paper,based on the various comparative evidences about the recursion-only claim,points out that individual differences in storage strategy,computation strategy and working memory during natural language processing cannot be negative evidences against recursion.Diversity in language ecology calls for a bio-universal explication and an evolution-sufficiency principle.The study of language evolution rejects interference and constrains of teleology,but must meet the requirements of new methodology.
作者 杨烈祥
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期54-64,158,共11页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 湖南省哲学社科基金项目"语言递归机制及其生物演化要求研究"(08YBA007) 中南林业科技大学重点学科建设项目"外国语言学及应用语言学"(006-001(2011))资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Chipere, N. 2009. Individual differences in processing complex grammatical structures [A]. In G. Sampson et al. (eds.). Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable [C]. Oxford: OUP. 178-191.
  • 2Chomsky, N. 1956. Three models for the description of language [J]. IRE Transactions of Information "Theory 2 : 113-124.
  • 3Chomsky, N. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy [A]. In A. Belletti (ed.). Structures and Beyond [C]. Oxford: OUP. 104-131.
  • 4Chomsky, N. 2007a. Approaching UG from below [A]. In U. Sauerland & H. Gartner (eds.). Interfaces + Recursion : Language? [C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1-29.
  • 5Chomsky, N. 2007b. Biolinguistic exploration: Design, development, evolution [J]. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15: 1-21.
  • 6Chomsky, N. 2008. On phases [A]. In R. Freidin et al. (eds.). Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory [C]. Cambridge, MA. : The MIT Press. 133-166.
  • 7Chomsky, N. 2010. Some simple evo-devo theses: How true might they be for language? [A]. In R. Larson et al. (eds.). 2010. 45-62.
  • 8Christiansen, M. & M. MacDonald. 2009. A usage-based approach to recursion in sentence processing [J]. Language Learning (Supplement) : 126-161.
  • 9De Beule, J. 2007. Compositionality, Hierarchy and Recursion in Language: A Case Study in Fluid Construction Grammar [D]. Ph. D. Dissertation. Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
  • 10Evans, N. & S. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science [J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 429-492.

二级参考文献66

  • 1钱冠连.语言的递归性及其根源[J].外国语,2001,24(3):8-14. 被引量:36
  • 2钱冠连.语言的离散性[J].外语研究,2001,18(1):27-30. 被引量:14
  • 3石毓智.论语言表达的创新机制[J].外语研究,2007,24(3):28-34. 被引量:11
  • 4Hauser M D, N Chomsky, T Fitch. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how does it evolve[J]. Science, 2002, (298) :169--179.
  • 5Chomsky N. The Minimalist Program[M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1995.
  • 6Fitch T, M D Hauser, N Chomsky. The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications[ J ]. Cognition, 2005,97(9) :179--210.
  • 7Chomsky N. Beyond explanatory adequacy [A]//A. Belletti (ed) Structures and Beyond[C]. Oxford:OUP. 12004:04--131.
  • 8Hornstein N. A Theory of Syntax : Minimal Operations and Universal Grammar[M]. Cambridge: CUP. 2008.
  • 9Verhagen A. Syntax, recursion, productivity: A usage-based perspective on the evolution of grammar [ A ]//In A. Lubotsky, J. Schaeken & J. Wiedenhof (eds.). Evidence and Counter-Evidence: Essays in Honour of Frederik Kortlandt: General Linguistics (Vol. 2) [C]. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 2008: 399--414.
  • 10Jackendoff R, S Pinker. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language[J]. Cognition, 2005,97(9) :211--225.

共引文献17

同被引文献124

引证文献14

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部