期刊文献+

原型理论视角下的离散与模糊 被引量:7

A Prototypical Study of Discreteness and Fuzziness
原文传递
导出
摘要 离散与模糊是两个截然相反的范畴观,两者的争论由来已久,在语言研究中尤为如此。本文简要回顾相关哲学问题的争论,然后着重讨论范畴化的认知机制、形式主义与功能主义就该问题的对峙、语言范畴的渐进等问题。本文在原型理论基础上,提出用渐进模型来糅合离散和模糊这两个不同的范畴观。 Discreteness vs. fuzziness has been a continuing debate as two opposed ideas on categorization, which is especially so in all domains of linguistic analysis. This paper starts with a brief review of the history of philosophical debates as a backdrop to the issue, and proceeds to discuss the cognitive mechanisms of categorization, the opposition between formalism and functionalism, and gradience as linguistic continuity. A compromise between absolute discreteness and fuzziness is proposed with the help of a gradience model constructed on the basis of the prototype theory.
作者 李基安
机构地区 上海外国语大学
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期36-41,共6页 Journal of Foreign Languages
关键词 离散 模糊 原型 渐进 discreteness fuzziness prototype gradience
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Aarts,B.Conceptions of Gradience in the historyof linguistics[J].Language Sciences,2004a,(26):343-389.
  • 2Aarts,B.Modelling linguistic gradience[J].Studies in Language,2004b,(28):1-49.
  • 3Aarts,B.Conceptions of categorization in the his-tory of linguistics[J].Language Sciences,2006,(28):361-385.
  • 4Chambers,J.K.&P.Trudgill.Dialectology[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2004.
  • 5Chomsky,N.Three factors in language design[J].Linguistic Inquiry,2005,(36):1-22.
  • 6Chomsky,N.Language and Mind[M].Cam-bridge:Cambridge University Press,2006.
  • 7Coates,J.The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries[M].London:Groom Helm,1983.
  • 8Frege,G.Concepts[A].B.Aarts,D.Denison,E.Keizer&G.Popova.Fuzzy Grammar[C].Ox-ford:Oxford University Press,2004:33-34.
  • 9Halliday,M.A.K.&C.Matthiessen.ConstruingExperience through Meaning[M].北京:世界图书出版公司,1999/2008.
  • 10Keefe,R.Theories of Vagueness[M].Cam-bridge:Cambridge University Press,2000.

二级参考文献1

共引文献57

同被引文献55

引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部