摘要
罪刑相适应不仅是立法原则,还是解释论应当遵循的重要原则,对构成要件的解释具有重要的指导作用。坚持严格区分法条竞合与想象竞合犯,固守"本法另有规定的,依照规定"表明只能适用特别法的先前理解,总是指责立法存在缺陷,必然导致罪刑不均衡的刑法条文比比皆是的现象。我们应当果断摒弃先前错误的理解与做法,在解释论中最大限度地贯彻罪刑相适应原则,充分运用竞合论原理"从一重处断",以实现刑法的公平正义。
Suiting punishment to crime is not only legislative principle, but also principle of interpretative theory. It is an important guiding role of the interpretation of constitutive requirements. Previous understanding that is Sticking to different strictly overlap of articles of law from imaginative joinder of offenses usually cause imbalance of crime and punishment . We should prohibits deci- sively the previous understanding and adapt the principle of suiting punishment to crime in interpretative theory in maximum scale for realizing fairness and justice of criminal law.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第2期123-131,共9页
Legal Forum
基金
"江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目"的成果之一
关键词
罪刑相适应
解释论
竞合
从一重处断
suiting punishment to crime
interpretative theory
concurrence
choosing felony and giving severe punishment