摘要
作为法官裁决的思维方式,逻辑思维偏于僵硬、呆板,不能使司法活动适应复杂多变的社会现实和客观情况。因此,在坚持以司法三段论为裁判的框架形式前提下,法官在寻找大前提、确定小前提、大小前提之间的连接等各阶段,都需要借助经验思维。逻辑思维和经验思维的共同作用,始能达成司法正义。
Logic plays an important part in the judicial process of judges.Therefore,a judge should adhere to the premise of judicial syllogism as the framework and at the same time relies on empirical thinking in various stages of finding the major premise,identifying the minor premise and combining the two.In a word,only when logical thinking and empirical thinking work together can judicial justice finally be achieved.
出处
《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》
2012年第2期111-115,共5页
Journal of Ningbo University:Liberal Arts Edition
关键词
司法三段论
法律
事实
涵摄
经验思维
judicial syllogism
law
fact
subsumption
empirical thinking