摘要
目的:探讨完全腹膜化腹腔镜腹腔内置补片术(total peritoneum intraperitoneal onlay mesh,TPIPOM)治疗股疝的安全性及优越性。方法:回顾分析2006年1月至2009年12月应用TPIPOM治疗32例股疝患者的术后恢复情况及随访结果,并与同期30例腹腔镜经腹腹膜前补片植入术(transabdominal preperitoneal prosthesis,TAPP)对比分析。结果:两组均顺利完成手术,TPIPOM组手术时间[(32.8±5.4)min vs.(62.4±8.2)min]、术中出血[(8.1±4.0)ml vs.(36.1±7.1)ml]、下床活动时间[(1.2±0.3)d vs.(1.9±0.3)d]、术后疼痛持续时间[(1.2±0.5)d vs.(2.1±0.7)d]、住院时间[(4.3±1.1)d vs.(5.6±1.5)d]、术后异物感发生率(0 vs.17%)、住院费用[(5 200.0±750.2)元vs.(8 301.1±800.2)元]均优于TAPP组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者术后平均随访(20.2±8.3)个月,均无复发。结论:完全腹膜化腹腔镜腹腔内置补片术治疗股疝安全、有效,具有患者创伤小、康复快、住院时间短、费用低、不易复发、无异物感等优点,值得推广应用。
Objective:To explore the safety and superiority of total peritoneum intraperitoneal onlay mesh in laparoscopic femoral hernioplasty.Methods:Thirty-two patients with femoral hernia were performed with total peritoneum intraperitoneal onlay mesh(TPIPOM) while 30 patients were performed with transabdominal preperitoneal prosthesis(TAPP) from Jan.2006 to Dec.2009.Results:All patients in two groups were successfully performed.The average operative time,intraoperative blood volume,off-bed time,duration of postoperative pain,postoperative duration of hospital stay,the incidence of foreign body sensation and the total hospital cost in TPIPOM group were less than those in TAPP group [(32.8±5.4) min vs.(62.4±8.2) min,(8.1±4.0) ml vs.(36.1±7.1) ml,(1.2±0.3) d vs.(1.9±0.3) d,(1.2±0.5) d vs.(2.1±0.7) d,(4.3±1.1) d vs.(5.6±1.5) d,0 vs.17%,(5 200.0±750.2)yuan vs.(8 301.1±800.2) yuan,P0.05].There was no recurrence report during the period of follow-up(20.2±8.3) month.Conclusions:The surgery of TPIPOM for femoral hernioplasty is safe and feasible and shows superiority in terms of invasion,operative time,hospital cost,postoperative complications and recovery.
出处
《腹腔镜外科杂志》
2012年第2期131-133,共3页
Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
基金
吴阶平医学会临床科研基金资助项目(编号:32027100502
320675009106)
广东省医学科学基金资助项目(编号:A2007144
A2009132)
关键词
股疝
疝修补术
腹腔镜检查
对照研究
Femoral hernia
Hernioplasty
Laparoscopy
Comparative study