期刊文献+

一种基于位置优化的排序学习方法 被引量:2

A learning to rank approach based on ranking positions
原文传递
导出
摘要 如何设计有效的相关性排序函数是信息检索研究的一个核心问题,因为排序函数直接影响着搜索结果的质量。排序函数的好坏一般由信息检索评价方法进行评估,对其进行优化的主要困难是这些方法都依赖于结果文档的排序位置,因此对于查询的结果返回列表中相关文档的位置的研究是十分重要的。通过探索相关文档和不相关文档之间的偏序关系构造新的输入样本;该样本是由一个相关文档和一组不相关文档所构成的,它能够更加有效的区分文档的相关性;基于该输入样本,通过定义位置损失函数对排序结果进行优化。在公开数据集Letor3.0的上的实验结果显示该方法可以将多种排序评价方法的准确率平均提高2%,证明了所提出的方法的有效性。 Designing effective ranking functions is a core problem for information retrieval since the ranking functions directly impacted the relevance of the search results.Learning ranking functions from preference data in particular have recently attracted much interest.The ranking algorithms were often evaluated using information retrieval measures.The main difficulty in direct optimization of these measures was that they depended on the ranks of documents.So it was important to optimize the ranking positions of relevant documents in the result list.Specifically,the roles of preference were investigated between the relevant documents and irrelevant documents in the learning process.To remedy this,a new input sample named one-group sample was constructed by a relevant document and a group of irrelevant documents according to a given query.The new sample could effectively distinguish the relevance of documents.With the new samples a new position based loss function was also developed to improve the performance of learned ranking functions.Experimental studies were conducted using the Letor3.0 data set which improved ranking accuracies by 2% and demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method.
出处 《山东大学学报(工学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第1期19-24,共6页 Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60673039 60973068) 国家高技术发展研究计划(863计划)资助项目(2006AA01Z151) 教育部博士点基金资助项目(20090041110002) 教育部出国留学人员归国启动基金资助项目(20090041110002)
关键词 排序学习 信息检索 排序位置 learning to rank information retrieval ranking positions
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1LIU T Y.Learning to rank for information retrieval[J].Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval,2009,3(3):225-331.
  • 2ROBERTSON S E.Overview of the okapi projects[J].Journal of Documentation,1997,53(1):3-7.
  • 3ZHAI C X,LAFFERTY J.A study of smoothing meth-ods for language models applied to information retrieval[J].The SMART Retrieval System:Experiments in Au-tomatic Document Processing,2004,22(2):179-214.
  • 4PAGE L,BRIN S,MOTWANI R,et al.The pagerankcitation ranking:bringing order to the w eb[R].Stan-ford:Stanford University,1998.
  • 5KLEINBERG J M.Authoritative sources in a hyperlinkedenvironment[J].Journal of ACM,1999(46):604-632.
  • 6JOACHIMS T.Optimizing search engines using click-through data[C]//Proc of The Eighth ACM SIGKDDInternational Conference on Know ledge Discovery and Da-ta Mining(KDD'2002).Edmonton,Alberta,Canada:ACM,2002:133-142.
  • 7BURGES C,SHAKED T,RENSHAW E,et al.Learn-ing to rank using gradient descent[C]//Proc of the 22ndInternational Conference on Machine Learning(ICML'2005).Bonn,Germany:ACM,2005:89-96.
  • 8TSAI M F,LIU T Y,QIN T,et al.Frank:a rankingmethod w ith fidelity loss[C]//Proc of the 30th Interna-tional Conference on Research and Development in Infor-mation Retrieval(SIGIR'2007).Amsterdam,the Nether-lands:ACM,2007:383-390.
  • 9QIN T,LIU T Y,LAI W,et al.Ranking with multiplehyper planes[C]//Proc of the 30th International Confer-ence on Research and Development in Information Re-trieval(SIGIR'2007).Amsterdam,the Netherlands:ACM,2007:279-286.
  • 10MATVEEVA I,BURGES C,BURKARD T,et al.High accuracy retrieval w ith multiple nested ranker[C]//Proc of the 29th International Conference on Re-search and Development in Information Retrieval(SI-GIR'2006).Washington,USA:ACM,2006:437-444.

同被引文献9

  • 1Burges C, Shaked T, Renshaw E, et al. Learning to Rank Us- ing Gradient Descent[C]. Proc of the 22nd International Con- ference on Machine Learning (ICML'2005). Bonn, Germany : ACM, 2005:89-96.
  • 2Ming-Feng Tsai,Tie-Yan Liu, Tao Qin, Hsin-His Chen, Wei- Ying Ma. Frank :A Ranking Methord with Fidelity Loss. In: Proc of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Confer- ence on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Amsterdam. The Netherlands,2007:383-390.
  • 3Freund Y, Iyer R,Schapire R E,et al. An Efficient Boosting Algorithm for Combining Preferences[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Researeh, 2003 (4) :933-969.
  • 4Tie-Yan Liu. Learning to Rank for Information Retrival. Mi- crosoft Research Asia.
  • 5Jarvelin K,Kekalainen J. Irevaluation Methods for Retrieving Highly Relevant Documents[C]. Pmc of the 23rd International Conference on Research and Develop ment in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'2000) .Athens, Greece : ACM, 2000:41 ~48.
  • 6BAEZA-YATES R,RIBEIRO-NETO B. Modern Information Retrieval[M]. New Jersey : Addison Wesley, 1999.
  • 7花贵春,张敏,邝达,刘奕群,马少平,茹立云.面向排序学习的特征分析的研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2011,47(17):122-127. 被引量:7
  • 8林原,林鸿飞.基于神经网络的Listwise排序学习方法的研究[J].情报学报,2012,31(1):47-59. 被引量:3
  • 9彭泽环,孙乐,韩先培,石贝.基于排序学习的微博用户推荐[J].中文信息学报,2013,27(4):96-102. 被引量:15

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部