摘要
We measured the level of uric lead in workers exposured and nonexposured lead by DPSA,GFAAS and DCM.The basic parameters of the three methods demonstrated that sensitivity and precision of DPSA and GFAAS excelled that of DCM,but the linear range of DPSA and GFAAS are more narrow than that of DCM.All of The three methods had excellent accuracy(paired t-test P>0 05).The results showed the different of the three methods no significant.
We measured the level of uric lead in workers exposured and nonexposured lead by DPSA,GFAAS and DCM.The basic parameters of the three methods demonstrated that sensitivity and precision of DPSA and GFAAS excelled that of DCM,but the linear range of DPSA and GFAAS are more narrow than that of DCM.All of The three methods had excellent accuracy(paired t-test P>0 05).The results showed the different of the three methods no significant.
出处
《中国公共卫生》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2000年第2期184-184,共1页
Chinese Journal of Public Health
基金
辽宁省教委课题
关键词
铅中毒
尿铅
测定方法
比较分析
Uric lead,Differential Potentiometric Stripping Analysis(DPSA)Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy(GFAAS)Dithizone Colorimetric Method(DCM)
