期刊文献+

对中西方德育范式的误解 被引量:5

On the Misunderstanding of Chinese and the Western Moral Education Paradigms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 德育比较中存在浪漫化和妖魔化两种倾向,与之并存的还有对中西方德育范式的严重误解。对中国德育范式的妖魔化,是德育研究中贬低中国德育范式的重要原因。中国德育范式在学术研究中往往被涂上泛政治化、学生不自由等标签,但事实并非如此。而在对西方德育范式的浪漫化背后,西方德育范式的现实实践也存在重大问题与缺陷,特别是严重的校园暴力和忽视德育内容等。德育比较需要客观,并需要关注相应的社会文化基础。 To be romantic and to be demonized are the two tendencies in moral education comparison,at the same time,there are series of misunderstandings in both Chinese and Western moral education paradigms.To demonize the Chinese moral education paradigm is the important reasons for belittling the moral paradigm of China.In academic research,Chinese moral education paradigm are often coated with pan-politicization,students without freedom and other labels,but in fact it is not.Behind the romantic tendency of Western moral education paradigm,it has significant problems and deficiencies in the Western moral education paradigm both in reality and practice,especially the serious school violence and neglect moral content.Moral education comparison should be objective,and needs to focus on the corresponding social and cultural foundation.
作者 冉亚辉
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期81-89,共9页 Studies in Foreign Education
关键词 德育范式 德育理论 误解 中国 西方 moral education paradigm moral education theory misunderstanding China the West
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献40

  • 1Mok, M. M.-C., Cheong, Y.-C., Leung, S.-O., Shan, P. W.-J., Moore, P. &Kennedy, K. (2007). Self-directed learning as key approach to effectiveness of education: A comparison among China's Mainland, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan. In T. Townsend ( Ed. ) , International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement. Dordrecht : Springer, 839-858.
  • 2Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.) , Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press, 451-502.
  • 3Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40 (2) : 85-94.
  • 4Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance. Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 8.
  • 5Duncan, T. G. & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40 (2) : 117-128.
  • 6Paris, S. G. & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36 ( 2 ) : 89-101.
  • 7Turner, J. C. (2001). Using context to enrich and challenge our understanding of motivation theory. In S. Volet & S. J? rvel? (Eds.), MotivatiOn in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications. Amsterdam : Pergamon, 85-104.
  • 8Turner, J. C. & Meyer, D. K. (1999). Integrating classroom context into motivation theory and research: Rationales, methods, and implications. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich ( Eds. ) , Advances in motivation and achievement ( Vol. 11 ). Greenwich: JAI Press, 87-121.
  • 9Schuh, K. L. (2004). Learner-centered principles in teacher-centered practices? Teaching and Teacher Education, 20 ( 8 ) : 833- 846.
  • 10Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7 (3) : 255-275.

共引文献91

同被引文献127

引证文献5

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部