摘要
目的:比较瑞芬太尼和芬太尼复合普鲁泊福用于腹腔镜胆囊手术的麻醉效果。方法:ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级择期全麻手术患者80例,随机分为瑞芬太尼组(R组)和芬太尼组(F组)。记录诱导各时点的MAP、HR的变化,观察术毕患者清醒时间和拔管时间以及有无术中知晓。结果:R组的清醒时间和拔管时间与F组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),两组患者麻醉后MAP和HR均下降(P〈0.05)。结论:普鲁泊福复合瑞芬太尼比芬太尼诱导平稳,更优越、安全,麻醉效果满意。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the anaesthetic effect of red fentanyl and fentanyl tabor phenolic compound propofol on laparoscopic gallbladder operations. METHODS: 80 cases who needed ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ elective class of general surgery were randomly divided into red fentanyl group (R) and fentanyl group (group F). The MAP of induction time and HR changes were recorded. Waking time after operation and drawing tube were observed. RESULTS : Waking times after operation and of drawing tube were statistically significant differences (P 〈 0. 05 ) between the two groups. MAP and HR after anesthesia in the two groups were all decreased (P 〈 0. 05). CONCLUSION : Propofol compound poisson phenol red fentanyl offers an advantage over fentanyl in safety and satisfactory effect of anesthesia.
出处
《国际老年医学杂志》
2012年第2期67-69,共3页
International Journal of Geriatrics
关键词
瑞芬太尼
普鲁泊福
腹腔镜
胆囊切除
Red fentanyl
Propofol
Tabor phenolic Laparoscopic
Cystic resection