期刊文献+

153例错畸形患者W角的测量分析研究 被引量:2

153 Cases of Malocclusion in Patients with W Angle Measurement and Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:本研究使用一种新的头影测量方法-W角评价上下颌骨矢状向关系,据此分析安氏3种错类型W值。方法:对153例11~20岁患者头颅侧位片进行头影测量分析,按照ANB角、Wits值和β角分为3组,取平均值和标准差,分析男女差异。结果:分析安氏3种错类型患者W角的正常值;3组W值间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);各组W值在性别上没有显著差异。结论:W角能反映上下颌骨矢状方向不调,具有较好可重复性。 Objective: To introduce a new cephalometric measurement, named the W angle, to assess the sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible with accuracy and reproducibility. Methods: One hundred and fifty- three pre-treatment cephalometric radiographs of patients between the age of 11 and 20 years were selected. They were again subdivided into Classes Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ groups on the basis of Beta angle, Wits appraisal, and ANB angle. The mean and the SD for the W angle were calculated. Next, the differences between genders were analyzed. Final-ly , using the one-way analysis of variance and the Newman-Keuls test, we compared the data with those three groups. Results: The cephalometric standard values with normal occlusion were established. Moreover, three groups had statistically significant difference (P〈0.05). There existed no significant differences between genders. Conclusion: The W angle was developed as a new method to evaluate the sagittal jaw relationship more consistently.
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS CSCD 2012年第3期230-232,共3页 Journal of Oral Science Research
关键词 W角 错畸形 矢状向不调 头影测量 W angle Malocclusion Sagittal discrepancy, Cephalometries
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Riedel R A.The relation of maxillary structures to craniuminmalocclusion and in normal occlusion[J].Angle Orthodon-tist,1952,22:142-145.
  • 2Jacobson A.The"Wits"appraisal of jaw disharmony[J].A-merican Journal of Orthodontics,1975,67:125-138.
  • 3Baik C Y.Ververidou M.A new approach of assessing sagit-tal discrepancies:the Beta angle[J].American Journal ofOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,2004,126(1):100-105.
  • 4Moyers RE,Bookstein FL,Guire K E.The concept of pat-tern in craniofacial growth[J].American Journal of Ortho-dontics,1979,76:136-148.
  • 5Nanda RS.Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationshipbetween maxilla and mandible[J].Am J Orthod DentofacialOrthop,1994,105(4):328-344.
  • 6Braun S,Kittleson R,Kim K.The G-Axis:agrowth vec-tor for the mandible[J].Angle Orthodontist,2004,74(3):328-331.
  • 7Williams S,Leighton BC,Nielsen JH.Linear evaluation ofthe development of sagittal jaw relationship[J].AmericanJournal of Orthodontics,1985,88:235-241.
  • 8Jacobson A.Update on the Wits appraisal[J].Angle Ortho-dontist,1988,57:205-219.
  • 9Moore RN,DuBois LM,Boice PA,etlal.The accuracy ofmeasuring condylion location[J].American Journal of Or-thodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,1989,95:344-347.
  • 10Ishikawa H,Nakamura S,Hiroshi I,et al.Seven parametersdescribing anteroposterior jaw relationships:postpubertalprediction accuracy and interchangeability[J].AmericanJournal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,2000,117:714-720.

二级参考文献7

共引文献6

同被引文献24

  • 1刘东旭,王春玲,咸红红.上下颌基骨前后关系12项指标的成人正常值及其评价[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,1999,15(3):99-102. 被引量:6
  • 2田海英,左艳萍,董福生.Mc Na mara X线头影测量分析法[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2005,19(2):207-209. 被引量:3
  • 3林久祥.现代口腔正畸学[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,1999.659.
  • 4Broadbent BH.A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontics [J].Angle Orthod, 1931,1 (1):45.
  • 5Tweed CH.The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle in orthodontic diagnosis, classification, treatment planning, and prognosis[J]Am J Orthod Oral Surg, 1946,32:175-230.
  • 6Tweed CH.Indicationforthe extraction of teeth in orthodontic practice[J].Am J Orthod, 1944,30:405.
  • 7Tweed CH.Evolutonary trends in orthodontic past,past, present and future[J].Am J Orthod, 1953,39:81.
  • 8Downs WB.Variations in facial relationship:their significance in treatment and prognosis[J].Am J Orthod, 1948,34(10):812-840.
  • 9Steiner C.Cephalometric for you and me[J].Am J Orthod, 1953,39( 10):729-755.
  • 10Ricketts RM.Cephalometric Analysis and Synthesis[J]. Angle Orthod, 1961,31 (3): 141.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部