期刊文献+

日间门诊全麻下拔牙的临床应用及评价 被引量:1

Tooth Extraction Under General Anesthesia in Outpatient Department:A Retrospective Study with 18 Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:回顾性分析日间门诊全麻下拔牙的病例资料,总结日间门诊全麻下拔牙的麻醉特点、诊疗规范、手术特点和安全性。方法:收集日间门诊全麻下拔牙病例,总结选择全麻的原因、拔除牙位、离院评价得分,分析日间门诊全麻下拔牙的麻醉特点、手术特点。根据术中情况和术后复查分析该方法的安全性。结果:共收集18个病例,男11例,女7例,年龄7~50岁。选择全麻的原因包括:无法配合手术的儿童、智障、癫痫、咽部敏感、局麻药物过敏和有紧张晕厥病史。拔除牙位主要是阻生智齿和埋伏多生牙,均采用气管内插管静吸复合麻醉。所有病例手术顺利并安全离院,离院标准评分均在13分以上。结论:严格遵从诊疗规范的情况下,日间门诊全麻下拔牙对因各种原因无法配合局麻下手术的患者是一种安全有效的治疗方法。 Objective: To evaluate the indication and security of tooth extraction under general anesthesia in outpatient department. Methods: The patients accepted tooth extractions under general anesthesia in outpatient depart- ment were included in this study. The following information were recorded and summed, including: the reason for choosing general anesthesia, the position of the teeth removed and the score of postanesthetic discharge scoring system. Results: 18 cases were collected in this study. There were 11 male and 7 females, and the range of the age was from 7 to 50 years. The reasons for choosing general anesthesia including: children cannot corporate, falling sickness, mentally challenged, pharynx sensitivity, allergenic to local anesthesia drug and patients have swoon history because of overmuch nervous in dentistry treatment. The major positions of the teeth extracted were impacted teeth and supernumerary teeth. All patients accepted endotracheal intubation intravenous-inhalation combined anesthesia. All the operations were performed successfully and all the score of postanesthetic discharge scoring system exceeded 13. Conclusion: For the patients cannot cooperate local anesthesia, tooth extracting under general anesthesia is a safe method.
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS CSCD 2012年第3期244-246,共3页 Journal of Oral Science Research
关键词 日间门诊 全麻 拔牙 Tooth extraction General anesthesia Daytime outpatient
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献13

  • 1毛丽芬,刘琨翔.恒前牙发育畸形埋伏阻生与治疗[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2005,21(4):564-564. 被引量:6
  • 2Checchi L,Bonetti GA,Pelliccioni GA, etat Removing high-risk impacted mandibular third molar: A surgical-orthodontic approach[J]. JAM Dent Assoe,1996,127(8): 214.
  • 3Renton T, Hakins M, Sproate C, et al. A randomized con- trolled clinical trial to compare the incidence of injury to the inferior alve-olar nerve as a result of coronectmy and removal of mandibular third molars[J]. Br J Maxillofac Surg, 2005, 43 : 7 -12.
  • 4Cartwright PD, SlUing G: Midazolam and diazepam in ketamine anesthesia.Anesthesia, 1984, 39: 439-440.
  • 5Reich DL, Silvay G: Ketamine: An update on the filst twenty-five years of clinical experience. Can J Anaesthesiol, 1989, 186: 35-37.
  • 6Green SM, Nakamura R, Johnson NE: Ketamine sedatiort for pediatric procedures. Part 2. Review and implicatiorts. Ann Emerg Med, 1990, 19:1033- 1034.
  • 7Green SM, Nakamura R, Johnson NE: Ketamine sedaticm for pediatric procedures. Part 1. A prospective series. Ann Emerg Med, 1990, 19:1024- 1025.
  • 8Krafft TC, Kramer N, Kunzelmann KH, et al. Experience with midazolam as sedative in the dental treatment of uncooperative children. J Dent Child,1993, 60:295-299.
  • 9lee- Kim SJ, Fadavi S, Punwani 1, et al. Nasal versus oral midazolam sedation for pediatric dental patients. J Dent Child, 2004, 71: 126-130.
  • 10梁颂,李静远,时清,蔡爽.纵向断层摄影术在儿童前牙区埋伏多生牙拔除中的应用[J].北京口腔医学,2008,16(4):226-227. 被引量:5

共引文献31

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部