期刊文献+

A Review of RtI (Response to Intervention) Process and How It Is Implemented in Our Public School System

A Review of RtI (Response to Intervention) Process and How It Is Implemented in Our Public School System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Rtl (Response to Intervention) process is implemented in each and every U.S. kindergarten thru 12 public schools and it is the major intervention program before the students are identified as students eligible for special education services, English as a Second Language services, Bilingual Education services, services provided under Section 504, and services for Gifted and Talented students, which are all major educational programs that are subject to direct or indirect extra funding. In this review, legal aspects of Rtl Program currently implemented in kindergarten thru 12 U.S. Public School System that may be applicable to educational systems of other regions and countries are discussed within the context of legal basis as well as instructional basis, program objectives, 3-tier Rtl Model, assessments, progress monitoring, curriculum based measurement, using an RtI model to address behavioral concerns, personnel legally accountable for RtI process, and referral
作者 Volkan Cicek
机构地区 Ishik University
出处 《Sino-US English Teaching》 2012年第1期846-855,共10页 中美英语教学(英文版)
关键词 INTERVENTION tier paraprofessional SCREENING 英语教学 教学方法 阅读教学 英语翻译
  • 相关文献

参考文献61

  • 1A student's guide to the IEP by the national dissemination center for children with disabilities. (2005). Retrieved from http://nichcy.org/pubs/stuguide/st 1 book.htm.
  • 2Batsche, G., Elliott, J., Graden, J. L., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J. F., Prasse, D., Reschly, D. J & Tilly, W. D. (2006). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, V.A.: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
  • 3Bender, W. N., Ulmer, L., Baskette, M. R., & Shores, C. (2007). Will RtI work? Ongoing questions. In W. N. Bender & C. Shores (Eds.), Response to intervention: A practical guide for every teacher. Thousand Oaks, C.A.: Council for Exceptional Children and Corwin Press.
  • 4Best evidence encyclopedia. (2010). The best evidence encyclopedia center for data-driven reform in education. Johns Hopkins University. Retrieved from http://www.bestevidence.org/.
  • 5Bickel, W., Zigmond, N., & McCall, R. (1998). Documentation and impact of Pennsylvania's instructional support team process." Final report. Pittsburgh, P.A.: Pennsylvania Bureau of Special Education and the University of Pittsburgh.
  • 6Bradley, R., Danielson, L. C., & Hallahan, D. P. (2002). Identification of learning disabilities." Research to practice. Washington, D.C.: Erlbaum.
  • 7Bradley, R., Danielson, L., & Doolittle, J. (2007). Responsiveness to intervention: 1997-2007. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 8-12.
  • 8Bums, M. K., & Van Der Heyden, A. M. (Eds.). Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 396-407). New York: Springer.
  • 9Council for exceptional children. (2007). CEC's position on Response to Intervention (Rtl): The unique role of special education and special educators. Retrieved from www.cec.sped.org/Policy&Advocacy/CECProfessionalPolicies.
  • 10Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing amongfive approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部